Abstract
Phylloxera seems to have key role in the fungal pathogen infection ratio while the fungal spread reduces the ability of phylloxera to reproduce. Intact roots of four-month-old grape plants were inoculated with phylloxera eggs in presence or absence of fungal pathogens. Fusarium solani SY7 infection was detected in all plant parts when grapevine roots were infested with phylloxera. The spread ratio of Fusarium solani SY7 increased from 74 to 100% of the infested plants with phylloxera. On the other hand, the phylloxera on F. solani SY7 infected roots were developed more slowly, since the nymphs and tuberosities were significantly decreased 49% and 31% respectively. The total plant biomass decreased to 29% in the presence of both F. solani SY 7 and phylloxera as compared to 9 and 17% in the presence of F. solani SY7 or phylloxera, respectively. This study sheds light on the correlation between fungi, phylloxera and grapevine and could help in the application of integrated pest management (IPM) programs against grape phylloxera.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium solani SY7 was detected in all plant parts after phylloxera infestation.
- Organ / stage
- all plant partse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium solani SY7
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium solanie0pathogen - Second interactor
- phylloxera
Phylloxerae0pest - Outcome
- Fusarium solani SY7 infectione0
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fusarium solani SY7 infection was detected in all plant parts when grapevine roots were infested with phylloxera.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylloxera infestation increased Fusarium solani SY7 spread from 74 to 100% of infested plants.
- Treatment
- with phylloxerae0
- Interactor
- Fusarium solani SY7Fusarium solanie0pathogen
- Second interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Outcome
- spread ratio of Fusarium solani SY7e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 74 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spread ratio of Fusarium solani SY7 increased from 74 to 100% of the infested plants with phylloxera.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylloxera nymphs decreased 49% on Fusarium-infected roots.
- Treatment
- F. solani SY7 infected rootse0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Second interactor
- F. solani SY7Fusarium solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- nymphse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 49%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, the phylloxera on F. solani SY7 infected roots were developed more slowly, since the nymphs and tuberosities were significantly decreased 49% and 31% respectively.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylloxera tuberosities decreased 31% on Fusarium-infected roots.
- Treatment
- F. solani SY7 infected rootse0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Second interactor
- F. solani SY7Fusarium solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- tuberositiese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 31%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, the phylloxera on F. solani SY7 infected roots were developed more slowly, since the nymphs and tuberosities were significantly decreased 49% and 31% respectively.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Both organisms together decreased grapevine biomass to 29%.
- Treatment
- both F. solani SY 7 and phylloxerae0
- Interactor
- F. solani SY 7Fusarium solanie0pathogen
- Second interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Outcome
- total plant biomasse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 29%e0
- Qualifier
- 9 and 17%e0
- Comparator
- F. solani SY7 or phylloxerae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total plant biomass decreased to 29% in the presence of both F. solani SY 7 and phylloxera as compared to 9 and 17% in the presence of F. solani SY7 or phylloxera, respectively.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium alone decreased grapevine biomass by the first reported amount, 9 in the 9 and 17% pair.
- Treatment
- F. solani SY7e0
- Interactor
- F. solani SY7Fusarium solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- total plant biomasse0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Value
- 9e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total plant biomass decreased to 29% in the presence of both F. solani SY 7 and phylloxera as compared to 9 and 17% in the presence of F. solani SY7 or phylloxera, respectively.”
e1“grapevine roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylloxera alone decreased grapevine biomass 17%.
- Treatment
- phylloxerae0
- Interactor
- phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
- Outcome
- total plant biomasse0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Value
- 17%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total plant biomass decreased to 29% in the presence of both F. solani SY 7 and phylloxera as compared to 9 and 17% in the presence of F. solani SY7 or phylloxera, respectively.”
e1“grapevine roots”
The same questions in other papers
Fusarium solani · Phylloxera · VitisPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Fusarium solani · growth · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
infection · Phylloxera · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.