Paper · 2018 · Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Description of the growth of pequi fruits by nonlinear models

Thais Destefani Ribeiro; Ricardo Wagner Pacopahyba de Mattos; Augusto Ramalho de Morais; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Pequi tree is a species native to the Brazilian cerrado, with wide geographic distribution, whose fruit is very appreciated in cooking, composing traditional dishes. In general, pequi fruit is consumed when ripe in the fresh form or in the various derived products such as oils, liqueurs, sweets, ice creams among others, involving important socioeconomic activity generating employment and income in family agriculture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjustment of Brody, Gompertz, Logistic and Von Bertalanffy models in the growth and development of pequi fruits based on their physical characteristics such as longitudinal and cross-sectional diameter and fresh mass obtained over time. Parameters were estimated using R software routines, using the least squares method and the Gauss-Newton iterative process. The adjustment of models was compared using the following criteria: residual standard deviation, adjusted determination coefficient and corrected Akaike information criterion. In general, data presented no correlation error structure and the Von Bertalanffy model did not fit fresh mass data. The models presented good quality in the adjustment to pequi growth data, except for the Brody model for fresh mass. The Gompertz and Logistic models were those that best described variables, and the Gompertz model was the most suitable to describe diameter and mass data. Based on the adjustment, a slow initial growth was observed up to about 20 days after anthesis; after this period, the fruit developed more rapidly up to 90 days and then presented a tendency to stability until the end of the evaluation period at 117 days after anthesis, with sigmoid curve character. Pequi fruits obtained final average value of 7.1 cm for cross-sectional diameter, 6.8 cm for longitudinal diameter and 113g for fresh mass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pequi fruit data showed no correlated error structure.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
no correlation error structuree0
Comparator
pequi growth datae1

Verbatim

e0

“data presented no correlation error structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi growth data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1199 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Von Bertalanffy did not fit pequi fruit fresh mass.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
fresh mass datae0
Comparator
Von Bertalanffy modele0

Verbatim

e0

“the Von Bertalanffy model did not fit fresh mass data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi fruit is consumed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–210 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brody model was an exception to generally good pequi growth model fits for fresh mass.

Taxon
pequie0
Outcome
adjustment to pequi growth datae0
Comparator
Brody modele0

Verbatim

e0

“The models presented good quality in the adjustment to pequi growth data, except for the Brody model for fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1243 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gompertz and Logistic best described the pequi growth variables.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
best described variablese0
Comparator
Gompertz and Logistic modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“The Gompertz and Logistic models were those that best described variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1317 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi growth data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1199 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gompertz was most suitable for pequi diameter and mass data.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
diameter and mass datae0
Comparator
Gompertz modele0

Verbatim

e0

“the Gompertz model was the most suitable to describe diameter and mass data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1399 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pequi fruit grew slowly through about 20 days after anthesis.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
slow initial growthe0
Value
about 20 days after anthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“a slow initial growth was observed up to about 20 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pequi fruit developed more rapidly to 90 days.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
the fruit developede0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Value
90 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit developed more rapidly up to 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pequi fruit growth tended to stabilize until 117 days after anthesis.

Taxon
pequie1
Outcome
tendency to stabilitye0
Value
117 days after anthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“presented a tendency to stability until the end of the evaluation period at 117 days after anthesis, with sigmoid curve character.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1701 · show in text ↑
e1

“pequi fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final pequi cross-sectional diameter averaged 7.1 cm.

Taxon
Pequie0
Outcome
cross-sectional diametere0
Value
7.1 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“Pequi fruits obtained final average value of 7.1 cm for cross-sectional diameter, 6.8 cm for longitudinal diameter and 113g for fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final pequi longitudinal diameter averaged 6.8 cm.

Taxon
Pequie0
Outcome
longitudinal diametere0
Value
6.8 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“Pequi fruits obtained final average value of 7.1 cm for cross-sectional diameter, 6.8 cm for longitudinal diameter and 113g for fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final pequi fresh mass averaged 113g.

Taxon
Pequie0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Value
113ge0

Verbatim

e0

“Pequi fruits obtained final average value of 7.1 cm for cross-sectional diameter, 6.8 cm for longitudinal diameter and 113g for fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1841 · show in text ↑