Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at N. E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand) with an objective to find out the appropriate row ratio and nutrient management strategy for chickpea + linseed intercropping system. The experiment was conducted in Split Plot Design with three replications having four main plot treatments (Planting patterns) viz; Sole chickpea, Sole linseed, chickpea + linseed (3:1), chickpea + linseed (4:2), and four Sub plot treatments (Fertility levels) viz., 0:0:0 NPK kg/ha (F1), 20:40:20 NPK kg/ha (F2), 40:40:20 NPK kg/ha (F3), 60:40:20 NPK kg/ha (F4). The results revealed that the grain/seed, straw/stover and biological yields of both chickpea and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping combinations. However, the higher chickpea equivalent yield (System Productivity) was recorded in chickpea + linseed intercropping combinations under both the row arrangements (4:2 and 3:1) were found at par with sole chickpea and significantly higher over sole linseed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea grain, straw and biological yields were higher in sole cropping than intercropping.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- sole croppinge0
- Outcome
- grain/seed, straw/stover and biological yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- intercropping combinationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the grain/seed, straw/stover and biological yields of both chickpea and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
Linseed seed, stover and biological yields were higher in sole cropping than intercropping.
Verbatim
e0“the grain/seed, straw/stover and biological yields of both chickpea and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
The 4:2 chickpea-linseed arrangement had chickpea equivalent yield comparable to sole chickpea and significantly above sole linseed.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 4:2e0
- Outcome
- chickpea equivalent yield (System Productivity)e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at par with sole chickpeae0
- Comparator
- sole linseede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher chickpea equivalent yield (System Productivity) was recorded in chickpea + linseed intercropping combinations under both the row arrangements (4:2 and 3:1) were found at par with sole chickpea and significantly higher over sole linseed”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3:1 chickpea-linseed arrangement had chickpea equivalent yield comparable to sole chickpea and significantly above sole linseed.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 3:1e0
- Outcome
- chickpea equivalent yield (System Productivity)e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at par with sole chickpeae0
- Comparator
- sole linseede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher chickpea equivalent yield (System Productivity) was recorded in chickpea + linseed intercropping combinations under both the row arrangements (4:2 and 3:1) were found at par with sole chickpea and significantly higher over sole linseed”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.