Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at University of Agriculture Sciences, Bengaluru to assess the performance of finger millet under different methods of establishment, planting geometry and nutrient sources on growth, yield and economics. The study comprised of two methods of establishment (direct sowing and transplanting), three planting geometry (30 × 10 cm, 30 × 30 cm and 45 × 30 cm) and two sources of nutrients (N1: RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg NPK/ha) and N2: FYM on N equivalent basis) laid in RCB Design with factorial concept and replicated thrice. Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method. The wider spacing viz., 45 × 30 cm and 30 × 30 cm has recorded higher leaf area (2194 and 1832 cm2/hill, respectively), total dry matter production of 38.68 and 40.73 g/hill, respectively, whereas, higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm). Significantly higher growth parameters viz., leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 39.74 g/hill, grain yield of 2701 kg/ha, straw yield of 4901 kg/ha, gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326 were recorded with application of recommended dose of FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting produced higher leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1892 cm2/hille0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting produced higher dry matter of 40.77 g/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- total dry matter production/hille0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 40.77 g/hille0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting produced higher grain yield of 2671 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2671 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting produced higher straw yield of 4745 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4745 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting had higher cultivation cost of 33767.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- cost of cultivatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 33767e0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting had higher gross returns of 106552.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 106552e0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting had higher net returns of 72786.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 72786e0
- Comparator
- direct sowinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher parameters viz., leaf area of 1892 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 40.77 g/hill, grain yield of 2671 kg/ha, straw yield of 4745 kg/ha, cost of cultivation of 33767, gross returns of 106552 and net returns of 72786 were recorded in transplanting method”
e1“direct sowing and transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
At 45 × 30 cm spacing, leaf area was higher at 2194 cm2/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 45 × 30 cme0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2194e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“The wider spacing viz., 45 × 30 cm and 30 × 30 cm has recorded higher leaf area (2194 and 1832 cm2/hill, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 × 30 cm spacing, leaf area was higher at 1832 cm2/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 × 30 cme0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1832 cm2/hille0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“The wider spacing viz., 45 × 30 cm and 30 × 30 cm has recorded higher leaf area (2194 and 1832 cm2/hill, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 45 × 30 cm spacing, dry matter was 38.68 g/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 45 × 30 cme0
- Outcome
- total dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 38.68e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“The wider spacing viz., 45 × 30 cm and 30 × 30 cm has recorded higher leaf area (2194 and 1832 cm2/hill, respectively), total dry matter production of 38.68 and 40.73 g/hill, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 × 30 cm spacing, dry matter was 40.73 g/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 × 30 cme0
- Outcome
- total dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 40.73 g/hille0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“The wider spacing viz., 45 × 30 cm and 30 × 30 cm has recorded higher leaf area (2194 and 1832 cm2/hill, respectively), total dry matter production of 38.68 and 40.73 g/hill, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended 30 ×10 cm spacing had higher grain yield of 2737 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 ×10 cme0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2737 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended spacing had higher straw yield of 4849 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 ×10 cme0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4849 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended spacing had higher cultivation cost of 33659.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 ×10 cme0
- Outcome
- cost of cultivatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 33659e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended spacing had higher gross returns of 110484.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 ×10 cme0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 110484e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended spacing had higher net returns of 76825.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 30 ×10 cme0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 76825e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“higher grain yield (2737 kg/ha), straw yield (4849 kg/ha), cost of cultivation ( 33659), gross returns ( 110484), net returns ( 76825) were recorded with recommended spacing (30 ×10 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF produced higher leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)e0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1934 cm2/hille0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher growth parameters viz., leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 39.74 g/hill, grain yield of 2701 kg/ha, straw yield of 4901 kg/ha, gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326 were recorded with application of recommended dose of FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF produced higher dry matter of 39.74 g/hill.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)e0
- Outcome
- total dry matter production/hille0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 39.74 g/hille0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher growth parameters viz., leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 39.74 g/hill, grain yield of 2701 kg/ha, straw yield of 4901 kg/ha, gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326 were recorded with application of recommended dose of FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF produced higher grain yield of 2701 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2701 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher growth parameters viz., leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 39.74 g/hill, grain yield of 2701 kg/ha, straw yield of 4901 kg/ha, gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326 were recorded with application of recommended dose of FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher straw yield of 4901 kg/ha and gross and net returns of 108242 and 78326.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4901 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e0“Significantly higher growth parameters viz., leaf area of 1934 cm2/hill, total dry matter production/hill of 39.74 g/hill, grain yield of 2701 kg/ha, straw yield of 4901 kg/ha, gross returns of 108242 and net returns of 78326 were recorded with application of recommended dose of FYM 7.5 t/ha + RDF (50: 40: 37.5 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha)”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →transplanting · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →potassium · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
phosphorus · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
transplanting · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
39 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.