Paper · 2018 · Journal of Experimental Botany

A generic individual-based model can predict yield, nitrogen content, and species abundance in experimental grassland communities

Lucas Faverjon; Abraham Escobar-Gutiérrez; Isabelle Litrico; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
35
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Functional-structural plant models are increasingly being used to analyse relationships between plant functioning and the topological and spatial organisation of their modular structure. In this study, the performance of an individual-based model accounting for the the architecture and population dynamics of forage legumes in multi-species grasslands was assessed. Morphogenetic shoot and root parameters were calibrated for seven widely used species. Other model parameters concerning C and N metabolism were obtained from the literature. The model was evaluated using a series of independent experiments combining the seven species in binary mixtures that were subject to regular defoliation. For all the species, the model could accurately simulate phytomer demography, leaf area dynamics, and root growth under conditions of weak competition. In addition, the plastic changes induced by competition for light and N in terms of plant development, leaf area, N uptake, and total plant biomass were correctly predicted. The different species displayed contrasting sensitivities to defoliation, and the model was able to predict the superior ability of creeping species to sustain regular defoliation. As a result of competition and management, the balance between species changed over time and was strongly dependent on the pair of species used. The model proved able to capture these differences in community dynamics. Overall, the results demonstrate that integrating the individual components of population dynamics in a process-based model can provide good predictive capacity regarding mixtures of cultivated species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model simulated phytomer demography, leaf area dynamics and root growth accurately under weak competition.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
phytomer demography, leaf area dynamics, and root growthe0
Comparator
conditions of weak competitione0

Verbatim

e0

“For all the species, the model could accurately simulate phytomer demography, leaf area dynamics, and root growth under conditions of weak competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted competition-driven changes in plant development, leaf area and nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
plant development, leaf area, N uptakee0
Comparator
competition for light and Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“the plastic changes induced by competition for light and N in terms of plant development, leaf area, N uptake, and total plant biomass were correctly predicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted competition-driven total plant biomass changes.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Comparator
competition for light and Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“the plastic changes induced by competition for light and N in terms of plant development, leaf area, N uptake, and total plant biomass were correctly predicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species differed in sensitivity to defoliation.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
contrasting sensitivities to defoliatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The different species displayed contrasting sensitivities to defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted that creeping species better sustained regular defoliation.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
superior ability of creeping species to sustain regular defoliatione0
Comparator
creeping speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“the model was able to predict the superior ability of creeping species to sustain regular defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species balance changed with competition and management and depended strongly on the species pair.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
balance between species changed over timee0
Qualifier
strongly dependent on the pair of species usede0

Verbatim

e0

“As a result of competition and management, the balance between species changed over time and was strongly dependent on the pair of species used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model captured differences in community dynamics.

Taxon
forage legumese1
Outcome
differences in community dynamicse0
Comparator
The modele0

Verbatim

e0

“The model proved able to capture these differences in community dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“population dynamics of forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–324 · show in text ↑