Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Seed potato minituber production in an aeroponic system under tropical conditions: electrical conductivity and plant density

Alex Humberto Calori; Thiago Leandro Factor; José Carlos Feltran; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Most seed potatoes in Brazil are produced in beds, pots or boxes containing substrate, but the yields are low. Aeroponic systems are one strategy for increasing the yield. However, the concentration of nutrient solutions, managed by varying the electrical conductivity (EC), is of upmost importance and can alter plant responses. Plant density is another important factor for obtaining high yields. The objective of this study was thus to determine the effect of nutrient-solution EC and plant density on plant and seed potato production in aeroponic system. The experimental design was a randomized block with a split-plot design and four replicates, with plots for EC and subplots for plant density. Two potato cultivars were tested. The best ECs for “Agata” and “Asterix” were 2.1 and 1.7 dS m−1, respectively. The highest plant density (100 plants m−2) for both cultivars produced the highest minituber yield and economic feasibility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best nutrient-solution EC for Agata was 2.1 dS m-1.

Material
Agatae1
Outcome
best ECse1
Value
2.1e1
Qualifier
dS m−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed potato minituber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best ECs for “Agata” and “Asterix” were 2.1 and 1.7 dS m−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best nutrient-solution EC for Asterix was 1.7 dS m-1.

Material
Asterixe1
Outcome
best ECse1
Value
1.7e1
Qualifier
dS m−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed potato minituber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best ECs for “Agata” and “Asterix” were 2.1 and 1.7 dS m−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density (100 plants m-2) produced the highest minituber yield and economic feasibility in both cultivars.

Treatment
plant density (100 plants m−2)e2
Outcome
minituber yield and economic feasibilitye2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed potato minituber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest plant density (100 plants m−2) for both cultivars produced the highest minituber yield and economic feasibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–937 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.