Paper · 2018 · Agronomy Journal

Cotton Response to Residual Poultry Litter: Leaf Area, Nitrogen Removal, and Yield

John J. Read; Ardeshir Adeli; Jack C. McCarty; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas A low to moderate N rate is a best management practice after cessation of pelletized poultry litter. This best management practice optimized leaf area, N removal, and lint yield, while reducing input costs. This best management practice reduced soil nitrate levels in the top 30 cm after harvest by approximately 61%. Nitrogen carryover from pelletized poultry litter (PPL) can partially meet cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) N demands. A 3‐yr study determined yield effects of 6.7 Mg ha −1 PPL applied in 2010 to 2013 on cotton leaf area, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and yield. Treatments in 2014 and 2015 were no N (control), residual PPL, residual PPL with 84 kg ha −1 N (urea ammonium nitrate) at squaring, and 56 and 84 kg ha −1 N at planting and squaring, respectively. Treatments in 2016 were control, residual PPL with 56 kg ha −1 N, residual PPL with 56 kg ha −1 N at planting and squaring, and split application of 112 kg ha −1 N. Applying 84 kg ha −1 N to residual PPL plots increased ( P < 0.05) leaf area index during the boll‐filling period. Across years, N removal did not differ between residual PPL with 84 kg N ha −1 and fertilizer N only (112 vs. 116 kg N ha −1 ), but was considerably less with residual PPL (40 kg N ha −1 ). Lint yield was greater ( P < 0.01) in PPL with fertilizer N than fertilizer N only by 10% in 2014 (1795 vs. 1633 kg ha −1 ), 5% in 2015 (1898 vs. 1809 kg ha −1 ), and 20% in 2016 (1860 vs. 1554 kg ha −1 ), suggesting residual PPL enhanced NUE. Following cessation of PPL, side‐dress N applications of 56 or 84 kg ha −1 appeared to meet cotton N requirement and enable optimization of fertilizer use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A low to moderate nitrogen rate after litter cessation optimized leaf area, nitrogen removal and lint yield.

Treatment
low to moderate N ratee0
Outcome
leaf area, N removal, and lint yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A low to moderate N rate is a best management practice after cessation of pelletized poultry litter. This best management practice optimized leaf area, N removal, and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The management practice reduced postharvest nitrate in the top 30 cm by about 61%.

Treatment
best management practicee0
Outcome
soil nitrate levelse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 61%e0
Qualifier
top 30 cm after harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This best management practice reduced soil nitrate levels in the top 30 cm after harvest by approximately 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 84 kg ha−1 nitrogen to residual litter increased cotton leaf area index during boll filling.

Organ / stage
boll‐filling periode0
Treatment
84 kg ha −1 N to residual PPL plotse0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 84 kg ha −1 N to residual PPL plots increased ( P < 0.05) leaf area index during the boll‐filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen removal did not differ between residual litter plus 84 kg N ha−1 and fertilizer-only treatments.

Treatment
residual PPL with 84 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
N removale0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
112 vs. 116 kg N ha −1e0
Comparator
fertilizer N onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N removal did not differ between residual PPL with 84 kg N ha −1 and fertilizer N only (112 vs. 116 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen removal was much lower under residual litter alone.

Treatment
residual PPLe0
Outcome
N removale0
Direction
considerably lesse0
Value
40 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N removal did not differ between residual PPL with 84 kg N ha −1 and fertilizer N only (112 vs. 116 kg N ha −1 ), but was considerably less with residual PPL (40 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2014, litter plus fertilizer raised lint yield 10% over fertilizer alone.

Treatment
PPL with fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
2014 (1795 vs. 1633 kg ha −1 )e0
Comparator
fertilizer N onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was greater ( P < 0.01) in PPL with fertilizer N than fertilizer N only by 10% in 2014 (1795 vs. 1633 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015, litter plus fertilizer raised lint yield 5% over fertilizer alone.

Treatment
PPL with fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
2015 (1898 vs. 1809 kg ha −1 )e0
Comparator
fertilizer N onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was greater ( P < 0.01) in PPL with fertilizer N than fertilizer N only by 10% in 2014 (1795 vs. 1633 kg ha −1 ), 5% in 2015 (1898 vs. 1809 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016, litter plus fertilizer raised lint yield 20% over fertilizer alone.

Treatment
PPL with fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
2016 (1860 vs. 1554 kg ha −1 )e0
Comparator
fertilizer N onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was greater ( P < 0.01) in PPL with fertilizer N than fertilizer N only by 10% in 2014 (1795 vs. 1633 kg ha −1 ), 5% in 2015 (1898 vs. 1809 kg ha −1 ), and 20% in 2016 (1860 vs. 1554 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that side dressing 56 or 84 kg ha−1 nitrogen can meet cotton nitrogen requirements after litter cessation.

Treatment
side‐dress N applications of 56 or 84 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
meet cotton N requirement and enable optimization of fertilizer usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side‐dress N applications of 56 or 84 kg ha −1 appeared to meet cotton N requirement and enable optimization of fertilizer use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1656 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.