Abstract
The characteristics of agronomic traits in the analogue lines of the Kooperatorka and Stepnyak bread wheat cultivars, in which alleles of the photoperiod sensitivity genes were identified by PCR, were studied. The level of recovery of the recurrent genetic background has been identified in the analogue lines, and the allelic state of the Rht8 dwarfing gene has been identified. The effect of the Ppd-D1a allele on the agronomic traits and growth rates of analogue lines, irrespective of other genetic systems, has been established, using the methods of dispersion and discriminant analyses. Differences in the results obtained by these two methods are explained by including intertrait correlations into the discriminant analysis. It has been shown that the most informative traits for discriminating between the lines were the date of heading and the plant height.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Recurrent genetic background recovery was identified in analogue lines.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- analogue linese0
- Outcome
- level of recovery of the recurrent genetic backgrounde0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The level of recovery of the recurrent genetic background has been identified in the analogue lines”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The Rht8 allelic state was identified.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Gene
- Rht8 dwarfing genee0
- Outcome
- allelic statee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the allelic state of the Rht8 dwarfing gene has been identified”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ppd-D1a affected agronomic traits of analogue wheat lines independently of other genetic systems.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- analogue linese0
- Gene
- Ppd-D1a allelee0
- Outcome
- agronomic traitse0
- Qualifier
- irrespective of other genetic systemse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of the Ppd-D1a allele on the agronomic traits and growth rates of analogue lines, irrespective of other genetic systems, has been established”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ppd-D1a affected growth rates of analogue wheat lines independently of other genetic systems.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- analogue linese0
- Gene
- Ppd-D1a allelee0
- Outcome
- growth ratese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of the Ppd-D1a allele on the agronomic traits and growth rates of analogue lines, irrespective of other genetic systems, has been established”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Including intertrait correlations explains the differences between dispersion and discriminant analyses.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Differences in the results obtained by these two methodse0
- Qualifier
- including intertrait correlations into the discriminant analysise0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in the results obtained by these two methods are explained by including intertrait correlations into the discriminant analysis”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Heading date and plant height were the most informative discriminators of analogue lines.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- most informative traits for discriminating between the linese0
- Comparator
- the date of heading and the plant heighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most informative traits for discriminating between the lines were the date of heading and the plant height”
t0“Wheat”