Claim · model-written summary
Including intertrait correlations explains the differences between dispersion and discriminant analyses.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- Differences in the results obtained by these two methodse0
- Qualifier
- including intertrait correlations into the discriminant analysise0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Differences in the results obtained by these two methods are explained by including intertrait correlations into the discriminant analysis”
t0“Wheat”
Title
A. O. Bakuma; Yu. A. Popovych; I. I. Motsnyi; et al. Cytology and Genetics 2018. doi:10.3103/s009545271805002x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource Recurrent genetic background recovery was identified in analogue lines.
- Observation The Rht8 allelic state was identified.
- Association Ppd-D1a affected agronomic traits of analogue wheat lines independently of other genetic systems.
- Association Ppd-D1a affected growth rates of analogue wheat lines independently of other genetic systems.
- Method / resource Heading date and plant height were the most informative discriminators of analogue lines.