Abstract
The use of humic substances, amino acids and marine algae extract can help in increasing sugarcane photosynthetic and metabolic efficiency, with effects on productivity and industrial quality. In this study it was evaluated the effect of the foliar feeding of two commercial products containing humic substances, amino acids and marine algae extract, on the nutritional efficiency, industrial quality, and yield of RB867515 variety sugarcane. It was conducted in two 10.0 ha fields, with the products applied in one field and not in the other (control). The commercial products were applied in 4.0 l and 5.0 kg doses per hectare to re-growth foliage sixty days after cutting the cane-plant when the plants presented an average height of 80 cm. Ten months after applying the products, ten samples were collected from each field to assess the juice quality and sugar production. Applying the products did not influence nutritional efficiency and industrial quality, but did increase stem productivity, since the average for the control field was 126.8 kg ha-1, whereas for the field where the products were applied it was 166.3 kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding with the commercial products did not influence nutritional efficiency or industrial quality of sugarcane RB867515 compared with the control field.
Verbatim
t0“increase sugarcane productivity”
e1“Applying the products did not influence nutritional efficiency and industrial quality”
e2“on the nutritional efficiency, industrial quality, and yield of RB867515 variety sugarcane”
e3“the effect of the foliar feeding of two commercial products containing humic substances, amino acids and marine algae extract”
e4“It was conducted in two 10.0 ha fields, with the products applied in one field and not in the other (control)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding with the commercial products increased stem productivity of sugarcane RB867515 compared with the control field.
Verbatim
t0“increase sugarcane productivity”
e2“on the nutritional efficiency, industrial quality, and yield of RB867515 variety sugarcane”
e3“the effect of the foliar feeding of two commercial products containing humic substances, amino acids and marine algae extract”
e4“It was conducted in two 10.0 ha fields, with the products applied in one field and not in the other (control)”
e5“but did increase stem productivity, since the average for the control field was 126.8 kg ha-1, whereas for the field where the products were applied it was 166.3 kg ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
micronutrient · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.