Paper · 2018 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Agronomic and nutritional responses of Carajas elephant grass fertilized with protected and non-protected urea

Francisco Gleyson da Silveira Alves; Maria Socorro de Souza Carneiro; Ricardo Loiola Edvan; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the agronomic and nutritional responses of the elephant grass cultivar Carajas when subjected to fertilization with protected and conventional urea. A randomized block design with 4×2+1 factorial arrangement was adopted. The treatments consisted of four doses (100, 200, 400, and 800 kg N ha-1), two nitrogen sources (conventional and protected urea), and one additional treatment without fertilization. The experiment was carried out from October 2015 to March 2016, in a semi-arid region with a dystrophic yellow latosol type soil. The application of conventional urea was done with each of the multiple cuts performed per year, whereas the protected urea was applied in a single dose. Total senescence rate (TSR), leaf and stem elongation, height, tiller density, total forage biomass, green leaf and stem biomass, and dry matter all increased with increasing N doses. However, the phyllochron, live material/dead material ratio, and agronomic efficiency all decreased with N increasing dose. Plants fertilized with protected urea presented greater TSR and phyllochron. Mineral matter content was higher in plants fertilized with conventional urea. Neutral detergent fiber content was maximized at a dose of 437.63 kg N ha-1. The protected urea resulted in a higher value of leaf/stem ratio at the 400 kg N ha-1 dose, whereas ether extract and crude protein at the 800 kg N ha-1. With application of conventional urea, the highest crude protein value occurred at a dose of 100 kg N ha-1. The morphogenesis, structure, production, and chemical composition of elephant grass ‘Carajas’ were all positively influenced when nitrogen doses were increased, with the recommended optimal dose for use being 400 kg N ha-1 for both sources. The use of protected urea is recommended because of its slow release and need for only a single application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose increased total senescence rate, leaf and stem elongation, and height.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
Total senescence rate (TSR), leaf and stem elongation, heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total senescence rate (TSR), leaf and stem elongation, height, tiller density, total forage biomass, green leaf and stem biomass, and dry matter all increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose increased tiller density and forage biomass.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
tiller density, total forage biomass, green leaf and stem biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total senescence rate (TSR), leaf and stem elongation, height, tiller density, total forage biomass, green leaf and stem biomass, and dry matter all increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose increased dry matter.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter all increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose decreased phyllochron, live-to-dead material ratio, and agronomic efficiency.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
N increasing dosee0
Outcome
phyllochron, live material/dead material ratio, and agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phyllochron, live material/dead material ratio, and agronomic efficiency all decreased with N increasing dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected urea gave a greater total senescence rate than conventional urea.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
protected ureae0
Outcome
TSRe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with protected urea presented greater TSR and phyllochron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected and conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected urea gave a greater phyllochron than conventional urea.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
protected ureae0
Outcome
phyllochrone0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with protected urea presented greater TSR and phyllochron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected and conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber content peaked at 437.63 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
a dose of 437.63 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Neutral detergent fiber contente0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neutral detergent fiber content was maximized at a dose of 437.63 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected urea produced a higher leaf/stem ratio at 400 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
protected ureae0
Outcome
leaf/stem ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
400 kg N ha-1 dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protected urea resulted in a higher value of leaf/stem ratio at the 400 kg N ha-1 dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected urea gave a higher ether extract at 800 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
protected ureae0
Outcome
ether extracte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
800 kg N ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protected urea resulted in a higher value of leaf/stem ratio at the 400 kg N ha-1 dose, whereas ether extract and crude protein at the 800 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected urea gave a higher crude protein at 800 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
protected ureae0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
800 kg N ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protected urea resulted in a higher value of leaf/stem ratio at the 400 kg N ha-1 dose, whereas ether extract and crude protein at the 800 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With conventional urea, crude protein was highest at 100 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
conventional ureae0
Outcome
crude protein valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
100 kg N ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With application of conventional urea, the highest crude protein value occurred at a dose of 100 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 400 kg N ha-1 for either urea source.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Outcome
recommended optimal dose for use being 400 kg N ha-1 for both sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the recommended optimal dose for use being 400 kg N ha-1 for both sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1774 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend protected urea for its slow release and single application.

Taxon
elephant grassCenchrus purpureust0
Outcome
use of protected urea is recommendede0
Qualifier
slow release and need for only a single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of protected urea is recommended because of its slow release and need for only a single application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1883 · show in text ↑
t0

“elephant grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.