Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the nematicidal efficacy of a biocontrol agent, Pseudomonas flourescens for the management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyneincognita on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv.'Avarodhi' under glasshouse conditions.All the treatments were found to significantly improve the growth and physiological parameters of chickpea and reduction in pathological parameters as compare to untreated inoculated control.The highest improvement was observed in those plants treated with P. flourescens alone.Concomitant and sequential inoculation of P. flourescens with M.incognita also showed significant improvement in growth parameters of chickpea.Least enhancement in growth parameters was observed in those plants inoculated with nematode alone.It may be due to the nematcidal behaviour of P. flourescens against root-knot nematode, M. incognita.Hence, it may be concluded that P. flourescens as biocontrol agent is better substitute against chemical nematicides for the sustainable management of M. incognita and reduce environmental hazards.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments improved chickpea growth and physiological parameters versus the untreated inoculated control.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- growth and physiological parameterse0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Comparator
- untreated inoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments were found to significantly improve the growth and physiological parameters of chickpea and reduction in pathological parameters as compare to untreated inoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments reduced chickpea pathological parameters versus the untreated inoculated control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- pathological parameterse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- untreated inoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments were found to significantly improve the growth and physiological parameters of chickpea and reduction in pathological parameters as compare to untreated inoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
P. flourescens alone gave the greatest improvement in treated plants.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- P. flourescens alonee0
- Outcome
- improvemente0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest improvement was observed in those plants treated with P. flourescens alone”
t0“parameters of chickpea and reduction”
Claim · model-written summary
Concomitant inoculation with P. flourescens and M.incognita significantly improved chickpea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Concomitante0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Concomitant and sequential inoculation of P. flourescens with M.incognita also showed significant improvement in growth parameters of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential inoculation with P. flourescens and M.incognita significantly improved chickpea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- sequential inoculation of P. flourescens with M.incognitae0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Concomitant and sequential inoculation of P. flourescens with M.incognita also showed significant improvement in growth parameters of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode-only inoculated plants had the least growth enhancement.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- nematode alonee0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- Least enhancemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Least enhancement in growth parameters was observed in those plants inoculated with nematode alone”
t0“parameters of chickpea and reduction”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest P. flourescens as a sustainable substitute for chemical nematicides against M. incognita.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- better substitute against chemical nematicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“P. flourescens as biocontrol agent is better substitute against chemical nematicides for the sustainable management of M. incognita and reduce environmental hazards”
t0“parameters of chickpea and reduction”
The same questions in other papers
Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.