Paper · 2018 · Agriculture and Natural Resources

In vitro mineral nutrition for improving growth and multiplication of stevia

Sukalya Poothong; Thanh Khen; Orada Chumphukam

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In vitro propagation is important for rapid multiplication of a wide range of nursery crops or medicinal plants, including stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of mineral salts on plant growth and development of stevia shoot cultures. Response surface methodology was used to design experiments by varying three factors: nitrogen salts (NH4NO3 and KNO3), mesos salts (CaCl2, KH2PO4 and MgSO4) and minor elements (Zn-Mn-Cu-Co-Mo-B-I-EDTA-chelated iron). The concentrations of each factor were defined as relative concentrations compared to Murashige and Skoog (MS) concentrations (0.5–3.0 × MS). The effects were evaluated of these three factors on plant quality, multiplication, shoot length and leaf numbers. The minor elements were the most significant factors associated with shoot length and leaf numbers. Increasing minor elements above an MS level of 1 × and decreasing nitrogen tended to increase shoot length significantly. Increasing minor elements and nitrogen up to 3 × MS and increasing mesos to 1.5 × MS were required to improve leaf numbers. Two optimized media were compared to MS for growth characteristics, phenolics and antioxidant activity. One of the media was identified as significantly better than MS for growth, low phenolic production and low antioxidant response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minor elements were the most significant factors associated with shoot length and leaf number.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
minor elementse0
Outcome
shoot length and leaf numberse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minor elements were the most significant factors associated with shoot length and leaf numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing minor elements above 1 × MS tended to increase shoot length significantly.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
Increasing minor elements above an MS level of 1 ×e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
1 ×e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing minor elements above an MS level of 1 × and decreasing nitrogen tended to increase shoot length significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing nitrogen tended to increase shoot length significantly.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
decreasing nitrogene0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing minor elements above an MS level of 1 × and decreasing nitrogen tended to increase shoot length significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing minor elements and nitrogen up to 3 × MS improved leaf numbers.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
Increasing minor elements and nitrogen up to 3 × MSe0
Outcome
leaf numberse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing minor elements and nitrogen up to 3 × MS and increasing mesos to 1.5 × MS were required to improve leaf numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mesos to 1.5 × MS improved leaf numbers.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
increasing mesos to 1.5 × MSe0
Outcome
leaf numberse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing minor elements and nitrogen up to 3 × MS and increasing mesos to 1.5 × MS were required to improve leaf numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One optimized medium improved growth versus MS.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
One of the mediae0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
MSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the media was identified as significantly better than MS for growth, low phenolic production and low antioxidant response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One optimized medium yielded low phenolic production relative to MS.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
One of the mediae0
Outcome
phenolic productione0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
MSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the media was identified as significantly better than MS for growth, low phenolic production and low antioxidant response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One optimized medium yielded a low antioxidant response relative to MS.

Taxon
steviaSteviat0
Treatment
One of the mediae0
Outcome
antioxidant responsee0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
MSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the media was identified as significantly better than MS for growth, low phenolic production and low antioxidant response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“stevia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · SteviaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

in vitro · growth · SteviaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.