Paper · 2018 · Sensors

A Real-Time Weed Mapping and Precision Herbicide Spraying System for Row Crops

Yanlei Xu; Zongmei Gao; Lav Khot; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study developed and field tested an automated weed mapping and variable-rate herbicide spraying (VRHS) system for row crops. Weed detection was performed through a machine vision sub-system that used a custom threshold segmentation method, an improved particle swarm optimum (IPSO) algorithm, capable of segmenting the field images. The VRHS system also used a lateral histogram-based algorithm for fast extraction of weed maps. This was the basis for determining real-time herbicide application rates. The central processor of the VRHS system had high logic operation capacity, compared to the conventional controller-based systems. Custom developed monitoring system allowed real-time visualization of the spraying system functionalities. Integrated system performance was then evaluated through field experiments. The IPSO successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage and reduced segmentation error rates to 0.1% from 7.1% of traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm. IPSO processing speed was 0.026 s/frame. The weed detection to chemical actuation response time of integrated system was 1.562 s. Overall, VRHS system met the real-time data processing and actuation requirements for its use in practical weed management applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPSO algorithm reduced segmentation error rates to 0.1% from 7.1% for traditional particle swarm optimization.

Organ / stage
seedling growth stagee1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
segmentation error ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.1%e0
Comparator
traditional particle swarm optimization algorithme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced segmentation error rates to 0.1% from 7.1% of traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–901 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPSO algorithm processed frames at 0.026 s per frame.

Outcome
processing speede2
Value
0.026 s/framee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“IPSO processing speed was 0.026 s/frame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–901 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed detection to chemical actuation response time of the integrated system was 1.562 s.

Outcome
chemical actuation response timee3
Value
1.562 se3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The weed detection to chemical actuation response time of integrated system was 1.562 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–901 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VRHS system met the real-time data processing and actuation requirements for weed management.

Outcome
real-time data processing and actuation requirementse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“VRHS system met the real-time data processing and actuation requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–901 · show in text ↑