Paper · 2018 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Comparing Host Plant Resistance, Repellent Mulches, and At-Plant Insecticides for Management ofBemisia tabaciMEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) andTomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus

Hugh A Smith; Curtis A Nagle; Charles M MacVean; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 (Gennadius), the sweetpotato whitefly, transmits Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), which causes significant yield losses annually in Florida and other tomato-producing regions. Field trials were carried out at the University of Florida's Gulf Coast Research and Education Center to evaluate integration of plastic mulch type, at-plant insecticide, and tomato variety for management of the sweetpotato whitefly and TYLCV. The tomato varieties Charger, Rally, and Tygress had significantly lower season-long densities of whitefly eggs and nymphs than Florida-47 in one or more trials. Aggressive chemical control measures failed to reduce virus incidence in two of the three trials and did not improve yield. In 2013, when virus pressure was extremely high, yield in the susceptible variety was decimated, but virus-tolerant varieties produced a crop. Egg and nymph densities tended to be lowest on TYLCV-tolerant varieties and on tomato grown on metalized mulch. Differences in yield were primarily due to tomato variety and TYLCV incidence. Intensive insecticide use common in Florida tomato production may reduce losses when viral pressure is moderate, but not when migration of viruliferous whiteflies into the field is constant. Without significant winter freezes or a coordinated host-free period to reduce whitefly populations, insecticidal control and repellent-metalized mulches will offer limited protection compared with genetic tolerance to the virus, which may also be overcome under high virus pressure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato varieties Charger, Rally and Tygress had significantly lower season-long densities of whitefly eggs and nymphs than Florida-47 in one or more trials.

Material
Charger, Rally, and Tygresse1
Treatment
tomato varietiese1
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
season-long densities of whitefly eggs and nymphse1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
in one or more trialse1
Comparator
Florida-47e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The tomato varieties Charger, Rally, and Tygress had significantly lower season-long densities of whitefly eggs and nymphs than Florida-47 in one or more trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–607 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg and nymph densities tended to be lowest on TYLCV-tolerant tomato varieties.

Treatment
TYLCV-tolerant varietiese1
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse1pathogen
Outcome
Egg and nymph densitiese1
Direction
loweste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egg and nymph densities tended to be lowest on TYLCV-tolerant varieties and on tomato grown on metalized mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–986 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg and nymph densities tended to be lowest on tomato grown on metalized mulch.

Treatment
metalized mulche1
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse1pathogen
Outcome
Egg and nymph densitiese1
Direction
loweste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egg and nymph densities tended to be lowest on TYLCV-tolerant varieties and on tomato grown on metalized mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressive chemical control measures failed to reduce TYLCV incidence in tomato in two of the three trials.

Treatment
Aggressive chemical control measurese1
Outcome
virus incidencee1
Direction
failed to reducee1
Qualifier
in two of the three trialse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Aggressive chemical control measures failed to reduce virus incidence in two of the three trials and did not improve yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–731 · show in text ↑
e2

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressive chemical control measures did not improve tomato yield.

Treatment
Aggressive chemical control measurese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Aggressive chemical control measures failed to reduce virus incidence in two of the three trials and did not improve yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–731 · show in text ↑
e2

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013, under extremely high virus pressure, yield in the susceptible tomato variety was decimated.

Material
susceptible varietye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decimatede1
Qualifier
when virus pressure was extremely highe1
Setting
In 2013e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In 2013, when virus pressure was extremely high, yield in the susceptible variety was decimated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–828 · show in text ↑
e2

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high virus pressure, virus-tolerant tomato varieties produced a crop.

Material
virus-tolerant varietiese1
Outcome
produced a crope1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“but virus-tolerant varieties produced a crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–874 · show in text ↑
e2

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in tomato yield were primarily due to tomato variety and TYLCV incidence.

Material
tomato varietye1
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse1pathogen
Outcome
yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Differences in yield were primarily due to tomato variety and TYLCV incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive insecticide use may reduce tomato losses when viral pressure is moderate, but not when whitefly migration into the field is constant.

Treatment
Intensive insecticide usee1
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae1pest
Outcome
lossese1
Direction
may reducee1
Qualifier
when viral pressure is moderate, but not when migration of viruliferous whiteflies into the field is constante1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intensive insecticide use common in Florida tomato production may reduce losses when viral pressure is moderate, but not when migration of viruliferous whiteflies into the field is constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal control and repellent-metalized mulches will offer limited protection compared with genetic tolerance to the virus, without winter freezes or a host-free period.

Treatment
insecticidal control and repellent-metalized mulchese1
Outcome
protectione1
Direction
limitede1
Qualifier
Without significant winter freezes or a coordinated host-free periode1
Comparator
genetic tolerance to the viruse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Without significant winter freezes or a coordinated host-free period to reduce whitefly populations, insecticidal control and repellent-metalized mulches will offer limited protection compared with genetic tolerance to the virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1486 · show in text ↑
e2

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic tolerance to the virus may be overcome under high virus pressure.

Treatment
high virus pressuree2
Outcome
genetic tolerancee1
Direction
overcomee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Without significant winter freezes or a coordinated host-free period to reduce whitefly populations, insecticidal control and repellent-metalized mulches will offer limited protection compared with genetic tolerance to the virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1486 · show in text ↑
e2

“which may also be overcome under high virus pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1540 · show in text ↑
e3

“other tomato-producing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–201 · show in text ↑

mulching · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.