Paper · 2018 · Weed Technology

Influence of Formulation and Rate on Rice Tolerance to Early-Season Applications of Acetochlor

Michael Fogleman; Jason K. Norsworthy; Tom Barber; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Acetochlor (WSSA Group 15) is a very-long-chain fatty acid–inhibiting herbicide used to control grass weed species in row crops and could potentially be effective when used in a rice herbicide program. A field study was conducted in 2016 and 2017 at four locations to determine the effects of acetochlor formulation and rate on rice tolerance. Overall, rice was more tolerant to the microencapsulated (ME) formulation of acetochlor than to the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation, likely because of the potential for immediate absorption of acetochlor from the EC formulation following rainfall. Differences in rainfall among experimental sites and years caused variation in acetochlor activation and influenced crop injury. In all environments, PRE applications of either formulation resulted in the greatest injury at 2 WAT (61%), while injury following delayed PRE (DPRE) or early POST (EPOST) applications averaged 30% and 16%, respectively. When ME acetochlor was applied EPOST, rough rice yield was 97% of nontreated rice or 9,020 kg ha −1 , indicating that applications should be delayed until this stage to minimize crop damage and maximize yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice tolerated microencapsulated acetochlor better than emulsifiable concentrate.

Treatment
microencapsulated (ME) formulation of acetochlore0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice was more tolerant to the microencapsulated (ME) formulation of acetochlor than to the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–494 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall variation across sites and years influenced acetochlor activation and crop injury.

Outcome
crop injurye0
Qualifier
Differences in rainfalle0
Setting
experimental sites and yearse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in rainfall among experimental sites and years caused variation in acetochlor activation and influenced crop injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence acetochlor caused the greatest rice injury at two weeks after treatment, 61%.

Treatment
PRE applications of either formulatione0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
greateste0
Value
61%e0
Qualifier
2 WATe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PRE applications of either formulation resulted in the greatest injury at 2 WAT (61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed preemergence acetochlor applications caused 30% average rice injury.

Treatment
delayed PRE (DPRE)e0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“injury following delayed PRE (DPRE) or early POST (EPOST) applications averaged 30% and 16%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early postemergence acetochlor applications caused 16% average rice injury.

Treatment
early POST (EPOST) applicationse0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“injury following delayed PRE (DPRE) or early POST (EPOST) applications averaged 30% and 16%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early postemergence microencapsulated acetochlor gave rough rice yield of 97% of nontreated rice, or 9,020 kg ha −1.

Treatment
ME acetochlor was applied EPOSTe0
Outcome
rough rice yielde0
Value
9,020 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
97%e0
Comparator
nontreated ricee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When ME acetochlor was applied EPOST, rough rice yield was 97% of nontreated rice or 9,020 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1060 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend delaying acetochlor application to early postemergence to reduce damage and maximize rice yield.

Outcome
applications should be delayed until this stagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“applications should be delayed until this stage to minimize crop damage and maximize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1169 · show in text ↑

acetochlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

acetochlor · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.