Paper · 2018 · Revista Caatinga

SUGARCANE CROPS WITH CONTROLLED WATER DEFICIT IN THE SUB-MIDDLE SÃO FRANCISCO VALLEY, BRAZIL

WELSON LIMA SIMÕES; MARCELO CALGARO; MIGUEL JULIO MACHADO GUIMARÃES; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sugarcane is one of the most affected crops by water scarcity. The efficient use of the irrigation water is an alternative to minimize this problem. The objective of this work was to evaluate biometric parameters, yield, and technological quality of sugarcane plants subjected to different controlled water deficit regimes in the sub-middle São Francisco Valley, Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, in two crop cycles, with three replications, with ten treatments consisted of three controlled water deficits (15%, 30%, and 45% of the crop evapotranspiration - ETc), applied at three development stages of the plant - sprouting and tillering (Stage I), grand growth (Stage II), and maturation (Stage III) - and a control with 100% of the ETc throughout the entire crop cycle. The controlled water deficit did not affect the technological quality of the sugarcane in any development stage. The sugarcane yield was higher when using a controlled water deficit of 30% of ETc in the sprouting and tillering stages of the plants. The water deficit of 15% of ETc is recommended for the grand growth, or maturation stages of the sugarcane plants for a greater water use efficiency of the production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled water deficit did not affect sugarcane technological quality at any development stage.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Organ / stage
any development stagee2
Treatment
controlled water deficite2
Outcome
technological qualitye2
Direction
did not affecte2
Comparator
100% of the ETce1

Verbatim

e2

“The controlled water deficit did not affect the technological quality of the sugarcane in any development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control with 100% of the ETc throughout the entire crop cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 30% of ETc controlled water deficit in the sprouting and tillering stages gave higher sugarcane yield than the 100% ETc control.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Organ / stage
sprouting and tillering stagese3
Treatment
controlled water deficit of 30% of ETce3
Outcome
sugarcane yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
100% of the ETce1
Setting
sub-middle São Francisco Valleye0

Verbatim

e3

“The sugarcane yield was higher when using a controlled water deficit of 30% of ETc in the sprouting and tillering stages of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control with 100% of the ETc throughout the entire crop cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–814 · show in text ↑
e0

“The objective of this work was to evaluate biometric parameters, yield, and technological quality of sugarcane plants subjected to different controlled water deficit regimes in the sub-middle São Francisco Valley, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–378 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 15% of ETc water deficit is recommended for the grand growth or maturation stages for greater water use efficiency.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Organ / stage
grand growth, or maturation stagese4
Treatment
15% of ETce4
Outcome
water use efficiencye4

Verbatim

e4

“The water deficit of 15% of ETc is recommended for the grand growth, or maturation stages of the sugarcane plants for a greater water use efficiency of the production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1238 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 4 positive, 27 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

drought · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.