Paper · 2018 · Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

THE MORPHOGENIC POTENTIAL OF SIBERIAN POTATO CULTIVARS IN TISSUE CULTURES

S. M. Ibragimova; A. V. Romanova; G. Kh. Myzgina; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potato is an important crop widely cultivated throughout the world. It is prone to several pathogenic fungi, viruses, and bacteria, which cause severe economic loss every year. Recent advances in plant biotechnology have made it possible to produce resistant cultivars by plant genome editing. This approach allows crop modiications that would be diicult to obtain by conventional breeding techniques. A successful and reproducible plant system requires a responsive in vitro regeneration system. Three Siberian potato cultivars –Kemerovchanin, Tuleevsky, and Sapho – and two control cultivars – Golubizna and Nikulinsky – were chosen for in vitro response tests. The stem explants were excised from in vitro grown plantlets. Their stem explants were incubated on Murashige&Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1 mg/L trans­zeatin, 0.1 mg/L IAA, and 10 mg/L GA 3 with vitamins (medium P1). All the stages of cultivation up to obtaining full­ledged regenerant plants were carried out on medium P1. Every two weeks the explants were transferred to fresh nutrient media. All cultivars formed calluses but difered in terms of callus formation and in callus type. With further cultivation on the medium of the same composition, morphogenesis was observed: shoots formed on wound surfaces of the stem explants. Cultivars Tuleevsky, Kemerovchanin, and Golubizna showed high regeneration ability (73–97.7 %), while that of Sapho (63 %) was poor. All the Siberian cultivars were variable with regard to their morphogenic potentials. Root formation was observed in the shoots within 7 days on hormone­free MS. In the control (hormone­free medium), stem explants of all cultivars did not form calluses or develop shoots on the wound surfaces. The protocol described here is simple and eicient. It can be applied to other potato cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All potato cultivars formed calluses, with differences in callus formation and type.

Outcome
callusese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All cultivars formed calluses but difered in terms of callus formation and in callus type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots formed on wound surfaces of stem explants during further cultivation.

Organ / stage
stem explantse0
Treatment
medium of the same compositione0
Outcome
shoots formede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With further cultivation on the medium of the same composition, morphogenesis was observed: shoots formed on wound surfaces of the stem explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuleevsky showed high regeneration ability within the reported 73–97.7% range.

Material
Tuleevskye0
Outcome
regeneration abilitye0
Value
73–97.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars Tuleevsky, Kemerovchanin, and Golubizna showed high regeneration ability (73–97.7 %), while that of Sapho (63 %) was poor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kemerovchanin showed high regeneration ability within the reported 73–97.7% range.

Material
Kemerovchanine0
Outcome
regeneration abilitye0
Value
73–97.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars Tuleevsky, Kemerovchanin, and Golubizna showed high regeneration ability (73–97.7 %), while that of Sapho (63 %) was poor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golubizna showed high regeneration ability within the reported 73–97.7% range.

Material
Golubiznae0
Outcome
regeneration abilitye0
Value
73–97.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars Tuleevsky, Kemerovchanin, and Golubizna showed high regeneration ability (73–97.7 %), while that of Sapho (63 %) was poor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sapho showed poor regeneration ability of 63%.

Material
Saphoe0
Outcome
regeneration abilitye0
Value
63 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars Tuleevsky, Kemerovchanin, and Golubizna showed high regeneration ability (73–97.7 %), while that of Sapho (63 %) was poor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siberian cultivars varied in morphogenic potential.

Material
Siberian cultivarse0
Outcome
morphogenic potentialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the Siberian cultivars were variable with regard to their morphogenic potentials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots formed roots within seven days on hormone-free MS.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
hormone­free MSe0
Outcome
Root formatione0
Value
7 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root formation was observed in the shoots within 7 days on hormone­free MS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On hormone-free control medium, stem explants did not form calluses or shoots.

Organ / stage
stem explantse0
Treatment
hormone­free mediume0
Outcome
did not form calluses or develop shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the control (hormone­free medium), stem explants of all cultivars did not form calluses or develop shoots on the wound surfaces.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors describe the regeneration protocol as simple and efficient and applicable to other cultivars.

Outcome
simple and eiciente0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protocol described here is simple and eicient. It can be applied to other potato cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1826 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑