Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Efficacy of Different Oil Cakes on Management of Root Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne graminicola) in Rice Crop in Western Uttar Pradesh

Abhishek Kumar; Kamal Khilari; Sachin Kumar Jain; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Rice is one of the most important food crops in the world. In India, rice contributes 43 per cent of the total food grain production and 46 per cent of the total cereal production. Rice crop is affected by many fungal, bacterial, viral and nematode diseases. Among the nematodes, rice root knot nematode (M. graminicola) is considered as a major problem in rice crop. In present study, a pot experiment was conducted to test the efficacy of oil cake against rice root knot nematode. In this experiment, eight oil cakes viz. Neem, cotton, linseed, groundnut, sunflower, sesamum, mustard and mahua oil cake were taken. It was observed that many tested oil cake significantly reduced the galls/plant. Among all the cakes were found most effective against nematode infestation in rice root, at the 60 DAS, minimum 1.89 galls/plant were recorded, when mahua cake was applied at @ 50 gm/5kg soil, whereas in control pot 14.44 galls/plant was recorded. Most of tested oil cakes were also found effective in increase for the growth parameters (shoot length, root length, shoot weight and root weight) of rice plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Many of the tested oil cakes significantly reduced galls per plant caused by root knot nematode in rice.

Treatment
oil cakee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
galls/plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“many tested oil cake significantly reduced the galls/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 DAS, mahua cake at 50 gm/5kg soil gave the minimum galls per plant (1.89) versus 14.44 in control pots.

Treatment
mahua cake was applied at @ 50 gm/5kg soile0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
galls/plante0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.89 galls/plante0
Qualifier
14.44 galls/plante0
Comparator
control pote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“minimum 1.89 galls/plant were recorded, when mahua cake was applied at @ 50 gm/5kg soil, whereas in control pot 14.44 galls/plant was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested oil cakes increased shoot length and root length of rice plants.

Treatment
oil cakese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
shoot length, root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of tested oil cakes were also found effective in increase for the growth parameters (shoot length, root length, shoot weight and root weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested oil cakes increased shoot weight and root weight of rice plants.

Treatment
oil cakese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
shoot weight and root weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of tested oil cakes were also found effective in increase for the growth parameters (shoot length, root length, shoot weight and root weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1092 · show in text ↑

transgenic · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.