Paper · 2016 · Journal of Applied and Natural Science

Efficacy of different bio-pesticides against sucking pests of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Suraj Sarkar; Sandip Patra; A. Samanta

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out in the pre-kharif season of 2013 at Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India to evaluate the efficacy of different bio-pesticides against sucking pests of okra. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications for each treatment. The treatments viz. annonin 1% EC, karanjin 2% EC, Azadirachtin 1% EC, Metarrhizium anisopliae, Verticillium lecanii , Beauveria bassiana , Bacillus thuringiensis var Kurstaki, spinosad 45 % SC and imidacloprid 17.8% SL were applied at 15 days interval starting from seedling stage when whitefly and jassid infestation started. Results revealed that the overall best performance of insecticides against whitefly was recorded in imidacloprid treated plots with lowest mean population of whitefly (3.91 whitefly/15 leaves) followed by karanjin (4.16 whitefly/15 leaves) and azadirachtin (5.16 whitefly/15 leaves while the order of efficacy aginst jassid were imidacloprid (15.27 jassids/15 leaves) > karanjin (33.91jassids/15leaves)>azadirachtin(40.38jassids/15leaves). Effectiveness of test insecticides on the yield of okra wasspinosad>Bt>B. bassiana>azadirachtin>imidacloprid>annonin>karanjin>M. anisopliae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid-treated okra plots had the lowest mean whitefly population, 3.91 whiteflies per 15 leaves, the best overall performance among the insecticides.

Treatment
imidaclopride0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
mean population of whiteflye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.91 whitefly/15 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“imidacloprid treated plots with lowest mean population of whitefly (3.91 whitefly/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karanjin-treated okra plots followed imidacloprid for whitefly control, with a mean of 4.16 whiteflies per 15 leaves.

Treatment
karanjine0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Value
4.16 whitefly/15 leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“karanjin (4.16 whitefly/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin-treated okra plots followed karanjin for whitefly control, with a mean of 5.16 whiteflies per 15 leaves.

Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Value
5.16 whitefly/15 leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“azadirachtin (5.16 whitefly/15 leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Against jassid, imidacloprid was the most effective treatment, with 15.27 jassids per 15 leaves.

Treatment
imidaclopride0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
jassidse0
Value
15.27 jassids/15 leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“imidacloprid (15.27 jassids/15 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Against jassid, karanjin ranked next, with 33.91 jassids per 15 leaves.

Treatment
karanjine0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
jassidse0
Value
33.91jassids/15leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“karanjin (33.91jassids/15leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Against jassid, azadirachtin ranked third, with 40.38 jassids per 15 leaves.

Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
jassidse0
Value
40.38jassids/15leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“azadirachtin(40.38jassids/15leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The test insecticides ranked in this order for their effect on okra yield: spinosad, Bt, B. bassiana, azadirachtin, imidacloprid, annonin, karanjin, M. anisopliae.

Treatment
test insecticidese0
Outcome
yield of okrae0
Qualifier
spinosad>Bt>B. bassiana>azadirachtin>imidacloprid>annonin>karanjin>M. anisopliaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effectiveness of test insecticides on the yield of okra wasspinosad>Bt>B. bassiana>azadirachtin>imidacloprid>annonin>karanjin>M. anisopliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1245 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

insecticide · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.