Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imidacloprid was the most effective neonicotinoid against aphids, with the least infestation and 84.54 % population reduction over control.

A claim from Bio-efficacy of neonicotinoids against Aphis gossypii Glover of okra. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was the most effective neonicotinoid against aphids, with the least infestation and 84.54 % population reduction over control.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SL@ 50 g a.i. ha -1e0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid infestatione0
Direction
leaste0
Value
84.54 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL@ 50 g a.i. ha -1 was found as a most effective neonicotinoid insecticide against aphid. It recorded least aphid infestation and 84.54 % reduction of population over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–395
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68

Title

Bio-efficacy of neonicotinoids against Aphis gossypii Glover of okra.

Abhijit Ghosal; M.L. Chatterjee; A. Bhattacharyya Journal of Crop and Weed 2013

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e40ded4736fe2b0fea12f45f40fa2fbec2c190689cd94af2788e652271e7abfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.