Abstract
In two year studies imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5–10g/kg seed was found highly effective and significantly superior to carbosulfan 25 DS @ 50 g/kg seed in controlling the sucking pests of okra viz., aphid (Aphid gossypil), thrips (Thrips tabaci), Jassid (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla) and white fly (Bemisia tabaci). Imidacloprid 20 SL @ 100–125 ml/ha was also equally effective against the pest complex and significantly superior to monocrotophos 36 SL @ 1000 ml/ha. Neither of the formulations of imidacloprid has any adverse effect on seed germination or plant growth or natural enemies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with imidacloprid 70 WS was superior to carbosulfan against sucking pests.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5–10g/kg seede0
- Outcome
- sucking pests of okrae0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- carbosulfan 25 DS @ 50 g/kg seede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5–10g/kg seed was found highly effective and significantly superior to carbosulfan 25 DS @ 50 g/kg seed in controlling the sucking pests of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 20 SL was superior to monocrotophos against the pest complex.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 20 SL @ 100–125 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- pest complexe0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- monocrotophos 36 SL @ 1000 ml/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Imidacloprid 20 SL @ 100–125 ml/ha was also equally effective against the pest complex and significantly superior to monocrotophos 36 SL @ 1000 ml/ha”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Neither formulation adversely affected seed germination, plant growth or natural enemies.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- formulations of imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- seed germination or plant growth or natural enemiese0
- Direction
- any adverse effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither of the formulations of imidacloprid has any adverse effect on seed germination or plant growth or natural enemies”
t0“okra”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.