Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Epidemiology of Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus (OYVMV) and Its Management through Tracer, Mycotal and Imidacloprid

Muhammad Irfan Ali; Muhammad Aslam Khan; Abdul Rashid; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV). Four varieties of okra were subjected to screening and evaluation of the chemicals. The variety Saloni F1 was highly resistant while Subz Pari was moderately resistant. Diksha was the tolerant variety while Lush Green was moderately susceptible. The chemical Imidacloprid was most effective to control whitefly population and okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV). Correlation of environmental factors (maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity and rainfall) with percent plant infection of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) was also determined. There was a significant correlation between environment and disease severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saloni F1 was highly resistant to okra yellow vein mosaic virus.

Material
Saloni F1e0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse1pathogen
Outcome
highly resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety Saloni F1 was highly resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subz Pari was moderately resistant to okra yellow vein mosaic virus.

Material
Subz Parie0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse1pathogen
Outcome
moderately resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subz Pari was moderately resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–277 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diksha was tolerant to okra yellow vein mosaic virus.

Material
Dikshae0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse1pathogen
Outcome
tolerant varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diksha was the tolerant variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lush Green was moderately susceptible to okra yellow vein mosaic virus.

Material
Lush Greene0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse1pathogen
Outcome
moderately susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lush Green was moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was the most effective chemical for controlling whitefly populations in okra.

Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical Imidacloprid was most effective to control whitefly population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–431 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials were conducted to evaluate the epidemiological factors of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was the most effective chemical for controlling okra yellow vein mosaic virus.

Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)e0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical Imidacloprid was most effective to control whitefly population and okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–473 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental factors correlated significantly with severity of okra yellow vein mosaic virus disease.

Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV)Okra yellow vein mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Setting
environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation of environmental factors (maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity and rainfall) with percent plant infection of okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) was also determined. There was a significant correlation between environment and disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.