Paper · 2016

Sulphur as a factor that affects nitrogen effectiveness in spring rapeseed agrotechnics. Part I. Chosen yield components

B. Barczak; Z. Skinder; Roman Piotrowski

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Strict, three-year-long field experiment was performed on degraded Phaeozems, IIIb soil valuation class, with pH ranging from 6.5 to 7.1, of high richness in phosphorus and potassium, medium in magnesium, and low in sulphur. The experiment was carried out in a split-block design with two factors in four repetitions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of various doses of nitrogen (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg·ha-1) and sulphur (0, 20, and 60 kg·ha-1), taking into account their different application methods (in-soil and as foliar fertiliser), on the yield components of spring rapeseed cultivar Star. Fertilisation only with nitrogen significantly increased the values of all the studied components, while the sulphur-only fertilisation increased the number of seeds in siliques, as well as the mass of 1000 grains. The number of seeds per silique in none of the research years was significantly affected by the interaction between nitrogen and sulphur. As far as other characteristics are concerned, considering sulphur alongside nitrogen fertilisation, in general, resulted in a significant increase in their values, in comparison with the control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization alone significantly increased all studied rapeseed yield components.

Taxon
spring rapeseedt0
Treatment
Fertilisation only with nitrogene0
Outcome
all the studied componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilisation only with nitrogen significantly increased the values of all the studied components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization alone increased the number of seeds in rapeseed siliques.

Taxon
spring rapeseedt0
Treatment
sulphur-only fertilisatione0
Outcome
number of seeds in siliquese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the sulphur-only fertilisation increased the number of seeds in siliques, as well as the mass of 1000 grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization alone increased rapeseed 1000-grain mass.

Taxon
spring rapeseedt0
Treatment
sulphur-only fertilisatione0
Outcome
mass of 1000 grainse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the sulphur-only fertilisation increased the number of seeds in siliques, as well as the mass of 1000 grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen by sulphur interaction did not significantly affect seeds per rapeseed silique in any year.

Taxon
spring rapeseedt0
Treatment
interaction between nitrogen and sulphure0
Outcome
number of seeds per siliquee0
Qualifier
none of the research yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The number of seeds per silique in none of the research years was significantly affected by the interaction between nitrogen and sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining sulphur with nitrogen generally increased other yield component values significantly relative to control plants.

Taxon
spring rapeseedt0
Treatment
sulphur alongside nitrogen fertilisatione0
Outcome
their valuese0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
in generale0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“considering sulphur alongside nitrogen fertilisation, in general, resulted in a significant increase in their values, in comparison with the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.