Paper · 2019 · Plant Soil and Environment

The effect of agronomic measures on grain yield of winter wheat in drier conditions

Petr Vrtílek; Vladimír Smutný; Tamara Dryšlová; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a year of cultivation and three agronomic measures (pre-crop, soil tillage, application of fungicides) on the yield of winter wheat grown in the crop rotation without the livestock production. The results from the years 2011-2017, except for the year 2012, from the Žabčice Field Experimental Station (49°01'20''N, 16°37'55''E) were evaluated. The soil texture is clay loam soil and the soil type is fluvisol. In the field trial, winter wheat was grown after two pre-crops (winter wheat, pea). Two soil tillage technologies, namely the conventional tillage - CT (ploughing - at a depth of 24 cm) and the minimum tillage - MT (shallow loosening - at a depth of 15 cm) were used. Two fungicide treatments against leaf and spikelet diseases were used, and they were compared to the non-treated variants. The obtained results showed that the grain yield of winter wheat was statistically influenced not only by a year of cultivation, but also by the pre-crop, the application of fungicides, and mostly by the interaction of these factors with the soil tillage. The importance of pea as a suitable pre-crop for winter wheat was confirmed as the grain yield was higher compared to winter wheat as a pre-crop by an average of 0.49 t/ha. It was also found that the MT is a more appropriate technology than the CT, on average by 0.12 t/ha over the six years. The importance of fungicide treatment was also confirmed, where the grain yield of winter wheat was higher by 0.26 t/ha compared to the non-treated variant. The presented results brought a new knowledge for winter wheat management practice in dry conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year of cultivation statistically influenced winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Setting
year of cultivatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of winter wheat was statistically influenced not only by a year of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–986 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-crop statistically influenced winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pre-crope0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of winter wheat was statistically influenced not only by a year of cultivation, but also by the pre-crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1012 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application statistically influenced winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of fungicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of winter wheat was statistically influenced not only by a year of cultivation, but also by the pre-crop, the application of fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1043 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions with soil tillage were the strongest reported influence on winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
interaction of these factors with the soil tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of winter wheat was statistically influenced not only by a year of cultivation, but also by the pre-crop, the application of fungicides, and mostly by the interaction of these factors with the soil tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea as pre-crop raised winter wheat grain yield by an average of 0.49 t/ha versus winter wheat pre-crop.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
peae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.49 t/hae0
Comparator
winter wheat as a pre-crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pea as a suitable pre-crop for winter wheat was confirmed as the grain yield was higher compared to winter wheat as a pre-crop by an average of 0.49 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage raised winter wheat grain yield by an average of 0.12 t/ha versus conventional tillage over six years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
more appropriatee0
Direction
more appropriatee0
Value
0.12 t/hae0
Qualifier
over the six yearse0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MT is a more appropriate technology than the CT, on average by 0.12 t/ha over the six years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatment raised winter wheat grain yield by 0.26 t/ha versus untreated variants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.26 t/hae0
Comparator
non-treated variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide treatment was also confirmed, where the grain yield of winter wheat was higher by 0.26 t/ha compared to the non-treated variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1563 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.