Paper · 2018 · UKRAINIAN BLACK SEA REGION AGRARIAN SCIENCE

nfluence of nutrition optimization on the height and grain yield of spring barley varieties in the Southern Steppe of Ukraine.

A.V. Panfilova; V.V. Gamayunova

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The article presents the results of studies about the effectiveness of spring barley crop cultivation with modern retriever preparations in the background of mineral fertilizers carried out in 2013-2017 on the southern bleak soils in the Ukrainian Steppe. The effects of varietal characteristics of spring barley and nutrition options on the height of plants and grain yield. It was determined that for growing spring barley under presowing cultivation of mineral fertilizer dose N30P30 (background) and using foliar application crops at the beginning of the exit plants up and beginningearing phase to complex organic fertilizers Organic D2 and Escort - bio in the favorable conditions for the formationthe larger linear sizes of plants and the highest level of grain yield of the studied varieties are formed. For example, on average, over the years of research, spring barley plants of fertilizer variants were formed 3,22-3,25 t/ha of Adapt variety, 3,33-3,37t/ha of Stalker variety and 3,56 – 3,61t/ha of Aeneas variety. Percentage, which exceeded control indicators 25,8-27,0; 26,6 - 28,1 and 27,1 - 28,9% respectively. We must consider that the best from all investigated varieties of winter wheat for their complex of indicators was the variety Aeneas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley given presowing N30P30 plus foliar Organic D2 and Escort-bio formed larger linear plant sizes.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
mineral fertilizer dose N30P30 (background) and using foliar application crops at the beginning of the exit plants up and beginningearing phase to complex organic fertilizers Organic D2 and Escort - bioe1
Outcome
linear sizes of plantse1
Direction
largere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley under presowing cultivation of mineral fertilizer dose N30P30 (background) and using foliar application crops at the beginning of the exit plants up and beginningearing phase to complex organic fertilizers Organic D2 and Escort - bio in the favorable conditions for the formationthe larger linear sizes of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley given presowing N30P30 plus foliar Organic D2 and Escort-bio reached the highest grain yield level.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
mineral fertilizer dose N30P30 (background) and using foliar application crops at the beginning of the exit plants up and beginningearing phase to complex organic fertilizers Organic D2 and Escort - bioe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley under presowing cultivation of mineral fertilizer dose N30P30 (background) and using foliar application crops at the beginning of the exit plants up and beginningearing phase to complex organic fertilizers Organic D2 and Escort - bio in the favorable conditions for the formationthe larger linear sizes of plants and the highest level of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapt variety formed 3,22-3,25 t/ha on the fertilizer variants, exceeding the control by 25,8-27,0%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Material
Adapte1
Treatment
fertilizer variantse1
Outcome
grain yieldt0
Direction
exceedede2
Value
3,22-3,25 t/hae1
Qualifier
25,8-27,0e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley plants of fertilizer variants were formed 3,22-3,25 t/ha of Adapt variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–952 · show in text ↑
e2

“Percentage, which exceeded control indicators 25,8-27,0; 26,6 - 28,1 and 27,1 - 28,9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain yield of spring barley varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalker variety formed 3,33-3,37 t/ha on the fertilizer variants, exceeding the control by 26,6-28,1%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Stalkere1
Outcome
grain yieldt0
Direction
exceedede2
Value
3,33-3,37t/hae1
Qualifier
26,6 - 28,1e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“3,33-3,37t/ha of Stalker variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“Percentage, which exceeded control indicators 25,8-27,0; 26,6 - 28,1 and 27,1 - 28,9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain yield of spring barley varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeneas variety formed 3,56-3,61 t/ha on the fertilizer variants, exceeding the control by 27,1-28,9%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Aenease1
Outcome
grain yieldt0
Direction
exceedede2
Value
3,56 – 3,61t/hae1
Qualifier
27,1 - 28,9e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“3,56 – 3,61t/ha of Aeneas variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“Percentage, which exceeded control indicators 25,8-27,0; 26,6 - 28,1 and 27,1 - 28,9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain yield of spring barley varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–91 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeneas was the best variety for its complex of indicators among the investigated varieties (the abstract says winter wheat here).

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Aenease1
Outcome
the beste1
Qualifier
winter wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: the sentence names winter wheat although the study concerns spring barley

Verbatim

e1

“the best from all investigated varieties of winter wheat for their complex of indicators was the variety Aeneas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 29 positive, 7 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

application · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.