Paper · 2025 · InterConf

The influence of macro- and microelements on the production process of spring barley on sod-podzolic sandy loam soil

Larysa Dovbysh; Mykola Kravchuk; Victor Kozhukh; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2023–2025 at “Agroviva” LLC (Zhytomyr region, Ukraine) to evaluate the effects of mineral fertilization intensity and foliar micronutrient application on the productivity and grain quality of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano) grown on sod-podzolic sandy loam soil. Spring barley productivity showed a strong dependence on soil nutrient supply. Mineral fertilization at rates of N46Р24К24 and N69Р36К36 increased yields by 53.1% and 74.4%, respectively, compared with the unfertilized control (2.77 t ha⁻¹). Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovi provided an additional 6–9% yield gain, resulting in a maximum yield of 5.26 t ha⁻¹ (+90% vs. control). Mineral fertilization explained 80% of yield variability, confirming its dominant role. Enhanced nutrient supply improved plant height (+2–4%), ear length (+24–32%), kernel number (+14–15%), and 1000-grain weight (+11.7%), indicating better nutrient assimilation and assimilate redistribution. Grain quality also improved under balanced nutrition: protein content increased by 3–4%, and grain nature (density) by about 4% (+24 g L⁻¹), with foliar micronutrients contributing an additional +5–7 g L⁻¹. The combined application of macro- and micronutrients (N69Р36К36 + Nais Zernovi) proved the most effective strategy for maximizing yield stability and grain quality of spring barley under light-textured soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley productivity strongly depended on soil nutrient supply.

Taxon
Spring barleyHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
productivitye2
Qualifier
strong dependence on soil nutrient supplye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Spring barley productivity showed a strong dependence on soil nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization at N46Р24К24 increased spring barley yield by 53.1% compared with the unfertilized control.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Material
Belkanoe1
Treatment
Mineral fertilization at rates of N46Р24К24e3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
53.1%e3
Qualifier
2.77 t ha⁻¹e3
Comparator
unfertilized controle3
Setting
Zhytomyr region, Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during 2023–2025 at “Agroviva” LLC (Zhytomyr region, Ukraine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mineral fertilization at rates of N46Р24К24 and N69Р36К36 increased yields by 53.1% and 74.4%, respectively, compared with the unfertilized control (2.77 t ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization at N69Р36К36 increased spring barley yield by 74.4% compared with the unfertilized control.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Material
Belkanoe1
Treatment
N69Р36К36e3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
74.4%e3
Qualifier
2.77 t ha⁻¹e3
Comparator
unfertilized controle3
Setting
Zhytomyr region, Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during 2023–2025 at “Agroviva” LLC (Zhytomyr region, Ukraine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mineral fertilization at rates of N46Р24К24 and N69Р36К36 increased yields by 53.1% and 74.4%, respectively, compared with the unfertilized control (2.77 t ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovi gave an additional 6–9% yield gain in spring barley.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovie4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
gaine4
Value
6–9%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovi provided an additional 6–9% yield gain, resulting in a maximum yield of 5.26 t ha⁻¹ (+90% vs. control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding with Nais Zernovi gave a maximum spring barley yield of 5.26 t ha⁻¹, 90% above the control.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovie4
Outcome
maximum yielde4
Direction
maximume4
Value
5.26 t ha⁻¹e4
Qualifier
+90% vs. controle4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar feeding with the chelated complex Nais Zernovi provided an additional 6–9% yield gain, resulting in a maximum yield of 5.26 t ha⁻¹ (+90% vs. control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–717 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization explained 80% of spring barley yield variability.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Mineral fertilizatione5
Outcome
yield variabilitye5
Value
80%e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mineral fertilization explained 80% of yield variability, confirming its dominant role”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nutrient supply improved spring barley plant height by 2–4%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Enhanced nutrient supplye6
Outcome
plant heighte6
Direction
improvede6
Value
+2–4%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e6

“Enhanced nutrient supply improved plant height (+2–4%), ear length (+24–32%), kernel number (+14–15%), and 1000-grain weight (+11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nutrient supply improved spring barley ear length by 24–32%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Enhanced nutrient supplye6
Outcome
ear lengthe6
Direction
improvede6
Value
+24–32%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e6

“Enhanced nutrient supply improved plant height (+2–4%), ear length (+24–32%), kernel number (+14–15%), and 1000-grain weight (+11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nutrient supply improved spring barley kernel number by 14–15%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Enhanced nutrient supplye6
Outcome
kernel numbere6
Direction
improvede6
Value
+14–15%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e6

“Enhanced nutrient supply improved plant height (+2–4%), ear length (+24–32%), kernel number (+14–15%), and 1000-grain weight (+11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nutrient supply improved spring barley 1000-grain weight by 11.7%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Enhanced nutrient supplye6
Outcome
1000-grain weighte6
Direction
improvede6
Value
+11.7%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e6

“Enhanced nutrient supply improved plant height (+2–4%), ear length (+24–32%), kernel number (+14–15%), and 1000-grain weight (+11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced nutrition increased spring barley grain protein content by 3–4%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
balanced nutritione7
Outcome
protein contente7
Direction
increasede7
Value
3–4%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain quality also improved under balanced nutrition: protein content increased by 3–4%, and grain nature (density) by about 4% (+24 g L⁻¹), with foliar micronutrients contributing an additional +5–7 g L⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced nutrition increased spring barley grain density by about 4% (+24 g L⁻¹).

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
balanced nutritione7
Outcome
grain nature (density)e7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
4% (+24 g L⁻¹)e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain quality also improved under balanced nutrition: protein content increased by 3–4%, and grain nature (density) by about 4% (+24 g L⁻¹), with foliar micronutrients contributing an additional +5–7 g L⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar micronutrients added a further +5–7 g L⁻¹ to spring barley grain density.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
foliar micronutrientse7
Outcome
grain nature (density)e7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
+5–7 g L⁻¹e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Belkano)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–279 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain quality also improved under balanced nutrition: protein content increased by 3–4%, and grain nature (density) by about 4% (+24 g L⁻¹), with foliar micronutrients contributing an additional +5–7 g L⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of macro- and micronutrients (N69Р36К36 + Nais Zernovi) was the most effective strategy for spring barley yield stability and grain quality under light-textured soils.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
combined application of macro- and micronutrients (N69Р36К36 + Nais Zernovi)e2
Outcome
yield stability and grain qualitye2
Direction
most effectivee2
Setting
light-textured soilse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The combined application of macro- and micronutrients (N69Р36К36 + Nais Zernovi) proved the most effective strategy for maximizing yield stability and grain quality of spring barley under light-textured soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1428 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

micronutrient · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.