Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Development of Improved Production Technology for Existing Rice-Maize Cropping System in Tungabhadra Command Area

Malla reddy; B.K. Desai; B.G. Koppalkar

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Traditional agricultural practices have resulted in decreased soil fertility, shortage of water resources and deterioration of agricultural ecological environment, which are seriously affecting production of maize. A field experiment was conducted in medium black soil during kharif and rabi season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at farmer field near Agricultural Research Station, Sirguppa. The results revealed that, among improved production technologies of maize, higher grain yield were noticed with improved method-4 (T5: 7681 kg ha-1) over farmer method of cultivation (T1:5840 kg ha-1). The magnitude of improvement in grain yield of maize by improved method-4 (Minimum tillage, herbicide and 100% fertilizers application) was to the tune of 31.52 per cent over farmer method of cultivation. Improved production technology showed lower penetration resistance and higher soil moisture content as compared to existing rice-maize cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved method-4 raised maize grain yield to 7681 kg ha-1 versus 5840 kg ha-1 under farmer cultivation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
improved method-4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7681 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
T1:5840 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
farmer method of cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher grain yield were noticed with improved method-4 (T5: 7681 kg ha-1) over farmer method of cultivation (T1:5840 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved method-4 increased maize grain yield by 31.52 per cent over farmer cultivation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
improved method-4 (Minimum tillage, herbicide and 100% fertilizers application)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
31.52 per cente0
Comparator
farmer method of cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of maize by improved method-4 (Minimum tillage, herbicide and 100% fertilizers application) was to the tune of 31.52 per cent over farmer method of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved production technology lowered soil penetration resistance relative to the existing rice-maize system.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Improved production technologye0
Outcome
penetration resistancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
existing rice-maize cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved production technology showed lower penetration resistance and higher soil moisture content as compared to existing rice-maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved production technology raised soil moisture content relative to the existing rice-maize system.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Improved production technologye0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
existing rice-maize cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved production technology showed lower penetration resistance and higher soil moisture content as compared to existing rice-maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.