Paper · 2019 · American Journal of Botany

Inflorescence evolution in Santalales: integrating morphological characters and molecular phylogenetics

Daniel L. Nickrent; Frank Anderson; Job Kuijt

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
51
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The sandalwood order (Santalales) includes members that present a diverse array of inflorescence types, some of which are unique among angiosperms. This diversity presents not only interpretational challenges but also opportunities to test fundamental concepts in plant morphology. Here we used modern phylogenetic approaches to address the evolution of inflorescences in the sandalwood order. METHODS: Phylogenetic analyses of two nuclear and three chloroplast genes were conducted on representatives of 146 of the 163 genera in the order. A matrix was constructed that scored nine characters dealing with inflorescences. One character, "trios", that encompasses any grouping of three flowers (i.e., both dichasia and triads) was optimized on samples of the posterior distribution of trees from the Bayesian analysis using BayesTraits. Three nodes were examined: the most recent common ancestors of (A) all ingroup members, (B) Loranthaceae, and (C) Opiliaceae, Santalaceae s.l., and Viscaceae. KEY RESULTS: The phylogenetic analysis resulted in many fully resolved nodes across Santalales with strong support for 18 clades previously named as families. The trios character was not supported for nodes A and C, whereas it was supported for node B where this partial inflorescence type is best described as a triad. CONCLUSIONS: Essentially every major inflorescence type can be found in Santalales; however, the dichasium, a type of partial inflorescence, is rarely seen and is not plesiomorphic for the order. In the family Erythropalaceae, inflorescences are mostly in small, axillary fascicles or cymes. Successive families show both cymose and racemose types and compound systems (e.g., thyrses). Inflorescences in Amphorogynaceae and Viscaceae are not dichasial and in general are difficult to compare to "standard" inflorescences.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phylogeny resolved many Santalales nodes and strongly supported 18 previously named family clades.

Taxon
SantalalesSantalalese0
Outcome
fully resolved nodes across Santalalese0
Value
18 cladese0

Verbatim

e0

“The phylogenetic analysis resulted in many fully resolved nodes across Santalales with strong support for 18 clades previously named as families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The trios character was unsupported at nodes A and C.

Taxon
SantalalesSantalalest0
Outcome
trios charactere0
Qualifier
nodes A and Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The trios character was not supported for nodes A and C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Santalales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The trios character was supported at node B, where it is best described as a triad.

Taxon
SantalalesSantalalest0
Outcome
triade0
Qualifier
node Be0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“it was supported for node B where this partial inflorescence type is best described as a triad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Santalales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major inflorescence types are widespread in Santalales, while the dichasium is rare and not ancestral.

Taxon
SantalalesSantalalese0
Outcome
dichasiume0
Qualifier
rarely seen and is not plesiomorphice0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Essentially every major inflorescence type can be found in Santalales; however, the dichasium, a type of partial inflorescence, is rarely seen and is not plesiomorphic for the order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erythropalaceae inflorescences are mainly small axillary fascicles or cymes.

Taxon
ErythropalaceaeErythropalaceaee0
Outcome
inflorescences are mostly in small, axillary fascicles or cymese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In the family Erythropalaceae, inflorescences are mostly in small, axillary fascicles or cymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1628 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive families include cymose, racemose, and compound inflorescence systems.

Taxon
SantalalesSantalalest0
Outcome
cymose and racemose types and compound systemse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Successive families show both cymose and racemose types and compound systems (e.g., thyrses)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Santalales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amphorogynaceae and Viscaceae inflorescences are not dichasial and are difficult to compare with standard inflorescences.

Taxon
Amphorogynaceae and ViscaceaeAmphorogynaceaeViscaceaee0
Outcome
not dichasiale0
Qualifier
difficult to compare to "standard" inflorescencese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Inflorescences in Amphorogynaceae and Viscaceae are not dichasial and in general are difficult to compare to "standard" inflorescences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1858 · show in text ↑