Paper · 2019 · Natural Product Research

Classification of wine grape biotypes according to their variety and sanitary condition by fingerprinting untargeted analysis

Pasquale Crupi; Marica Gasparro; Angelo Raffaele Caputo

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Grapes secondary metabolites content mainly depends on variety, but also on climate and cultural conditions, including sanitary status. This study aimed to use a metabolomic fingerprinting approach for grouping 72 wine grape biotypes, Negro amaro n. (N), Malvasia nera di Brindisi/Lecce n. (M), and Uva di Troia n. (U), on the basis of their cultivar and virological conditions. The skins were extracted and analysed by flow injection mass spectrometry; a one-way ANOVA/Principal Component Analysis (PCA) allowed to efficiently cluster the samples, recognizing M from N and U biotypes. Conversely, the clusterisation of the biotypes affected by different virus complexes was really more tough and a clear distinction among infected plants was not always observed. However, very interestingly, by applying ANOVA/PCA to the biotypes of each varieties, singularly, healthy biotypes were sharply separated in all the varieties and a relationship between anthocyanin compounds and Grapevine leafroll associated virus (GLRaV3) slightly appeared.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ANOVA/PCA of skin metabolomic fingerprints efficiently clustered the wine grape samples and separated the M biotypes from N and U biotypes.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Outcome
efficiently cluster the samplese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“72 wine grape biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–233 · show in text ↑
e1

“a one-way ANOVA/Principal Component Analysis (PCA) allowed to efficiently cluster the samples, recognizing M from N and U biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clustering of biotypes affected by different virus complexes was more difficult and infected plants were not always clearly distinguished.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Outcome
clusterisation of the biotypes affected by different virus complexese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“72 wine grape biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–233 · show in text ↑
e1

“the clusterisation of the biotypes affected by different virus complexes was really more tough and a clear distinction among infected plants was not always observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within each variety, ANOVA/PCA sharply separated healthy biotypes from the others.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Outcome
healthy biotypes were sharply separatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“72 wine grape biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–233 · show in text ↑
e1

“healthy biotypes were sharply separated in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–922 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A slight relationship appeared between anthocyanin compounds and Grapevine leafroll associated virus (GLRaV3).

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Interactor
Grapevine leafroll associated virus (GLRaV3)Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3e1pathogen
Outcome
anthocyanin compoundse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“72 wine grape biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–233 · show in text ↑
e1

“a relationship between anthocyanin compounds and Grapevine leafroll associated virus (GLRaV3) slightly appeared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑