Abstract
Attempts were made to delineate the correlation coefficients of the vine, cluster and berry parameters with yield and quality in to direct and indirect effects in Thompson Seedless grape (Vitis vinifera L.) and its clones, namely Tas-A-Ganesh and 2A clone by Path Coefficient Analysis. Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh. All the parameters included in the study could determine the yield in 2A clone by only 1.0 per cent, as the residual effect was 0.99. The corresponding residual values were 0.506 for Thompson Seedless and 0.516 for Tas-A- Ganesh.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster weight had the strongest direct influence on Thompson Seedless yield.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Canes per vine had the strongest direct influence on Tas-A-Ganesh yield.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Berry diameter indirectly influenced Thompson Seedless yield through cluster weight.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Canes per vine indirectly influenced Tas-A-Ganesh yield through berries per cluster.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter.”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Berries per cluster had the strongest negative direct effect on yield in Thompson Seedless.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Berries per cluster had the strongest negative direct effect on yield in Tas-A-Ganesh.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster weight through berry diameter had the strongest negative indirect effect in Thompson Seedless.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
Berries per cluster through canes per vine had the strongest negative indirect effect in Tas-A-Ganesh.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Claim · model-written summary
The model explained 1.0 percent of yield variation in clone 2A.
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“All the parameters included in the study could determine the yield in 2A clone by only 1.0 per cent, as the residual effect was 0.99.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual effects were 0.506 for Thompson Seedless and 0.516 for Tas-A-Ganesh.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The corresponding residual values were 0.506 for Thompson Seedless and 0.516 for Tas-A- Ganesh.”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”