Claim · model-written summary
Canes per vine indirectly influenced Tas-A-Ganesh yield through berries per cluster.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter.”
e1“Yield was influenced most, directly by cluster weight in Thompson Seedless, while by canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh; indirectly by berry diameter via cluster weight in the former variety, while by canes/vine via berries/cluster in the latter. When the negative effects on yield were considered, the direct effect of berries/cluster was highest in Thompson Seedless, while it was of berries/cluster in Tas-A-Ganesh. Among the indirect negative effects, cluster weight through berry diameter was highest in Thompson seedless, but berries/cluster through canes/vine in Tas-A-Ganesh.”
Title
S D SHIKHAMANY; SWAPNIL V BORADE; SANJAY K JEUGHALE; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80543
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Association Cluster weight had the strongest direct influence on Thompson Seedless yield.
- Association Canes per vine had the strongest direct influence on Tas-A-Ganesh yield.
- Association Berry diameter indirectly influenced Thompson Seedless yield through cluster weight.
- Association Berries per cluster had the strongest negative direct effect on yield in Thompson Seedless.
- Association Berries per cluster had the strongest negative direct effect on yield in Tas-A-Ganesh.
- Association Cluster weight through berry diameter had the strongest negative indirect effect in Thompson Seedless.
- Association Berries per cluster through canes per vine had the strongest negative indirect effect in Tas-A-Ganesh.
- Association The model explained 1.0 percent of yield variation in clone 2A.
- Observation Residual effects were 0.506 for Thompson Seedless and 0.516 for Tas-A-Ganesh.