Paper · 2019 · Phyton

In vitro evaluation of native entomopathogenic fungi and neem (Azadiractha indica) extracts on Spodoptera frugiperda

Hern; ez-Trejo A; B Estrada-Drouaillet; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The control of Spodoptera frugiperda is based on synthetic insecticides, so some alternatives are the use of entomopathogenic fungi (EF) and neem extract. The objective of the study was to evaluate in vitro effectiveness of native EF and neem extracts on S. frugiperda larvae. Six EF were identified by DNA sequencing of ITS regions from three EF (Fusarium solani, Metarrhizium robertsii, Nigrospora spherica and Penicillium citrinum). They were evaluated in concentrations of 1 × 10⁸ spores/ mL. In addition, a second bioassay was carried out evaluating only F. solani, M. robertsii and N. sphaerica and the addition of vegetable oil. On the other hand, extraction of secondary metabolites from neem seed (Azadirachta indica) was carried out by performing, mass (g) and solvent volume (mL ethanol and water) combinations, which were subjected to microwaves and ultrasound. Subsequently, these extracts were evaluated in concentrations of 3%, 4% and 5%. A survival analysis was performed for each of the bioassays. With respect to the results of the first bioassay, F. solani obtained a probability of survival of 0.476 on the seventh day, while in the second bioassay, M. robertsii obtained 0.488 survival probability. This suggests that the expected percentage of larvae that stay alive on the sixth day is 48.8%. However, in the evaluation of the neem extract the combination 1:12/70% to 4% caused 84% mortality of larvae. The use of native HE and neem extracts has potential for the control of S. frugiperda.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium solani gave a larval survival probability of 0.476 on the seventh day.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae0
Treatment
F. solanie1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Second interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
probability of survivale1
Value
0.476e1
Qualifier
on the seventh daye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“neem seed (Azadirachta indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“F. solani obtained a probability of survival of 0.476 on the seventh day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarrhizium robertsii gave a larval survival probability of 0.488 in the second bioassay.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae0
Treatment
M. robertsiie2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Second interactor
M. robertsiie2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survival probabilitye2
Value
0.488e2
Qualifier
in the second bioassaye2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“neem seed (Azadirachta indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–726 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the second bioassay, M. robertsii obtained 0.488 survival probability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The neem extract combination 1:12/70% to 4% caused 84% mortality of larvae.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae0
Treatment
neem extracte3
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
mortality of larvaee3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
84%e3
Qualifier
combination 1:12/70% to 4%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“neem seed (Azadirachta indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–726 · show in text ↑
e3

“in the evaluation of the neem extract the combination 1:12/70% to 4% caused 84% mortality of larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1424 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest native entomopathogenic fungi and neem extracts have potential for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae0
Treatment
native HE and neem extractse4
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae4pest
Outcome
control of S. frugiperdae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed (Azadirachta indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–726 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of native HE and neem extracts has potential for the control of S. frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six native entomopathogenic fungi were identified by DNA sequencing of ITS regions.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae0
Outcome
identified by DNA sequencing of ITS regionse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed (Azadirachta indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–726 · show in text ↑
e5

“Six EF were identified by DNA sequencing of ITS regions from three EF (Fusarium solani, Metarrhizium robertsii, Nigrospora spherica and Penicillium citrinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–434 · show in text ↑

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Azadirachta indica (neem)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.