Paper · 2020 · Plants

Bioactivity of Common Pesticidal Plants on Fall Armyworm Larvae (Spodoptera frugiperda)

Kelita Phambala; Yolice Tembo; Trust Kasambala; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
97
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species that has successfully established across sub-Saharan Africa where it continues to disrupt agriculture, particularly smallholder cereal production. Management of FAW in its native range in the Americas has led to the development of resistance to many commercial pesticides before its arrival in Africa. Pesticide use may therefore be ineffective for FAW control in Africa, so new and more sustainable approaches to pest management are required that can help reduce the impact of this exotic pest. Pesticidal plants provide an effective and established approach to pest management in African smallholder farming and recent research has shown that their use can be cost-beneficial and sustainable. In order to optimize the use of botanical extracts for FAW control, we initially screened ten commonly used plant species. In laboratory trials, contact toxicity and feeding bioassays showed differential effects. Some plant species had little to no effect when compared to untreated controls; thus, only the five most promising plant species were selected for more detailed study. In contact toxicity tests, the highest larval mortality was obtained from Nicotiana tabacum (66%) and Lippia javanica (66%). Similarly, in a feeding bioassay L. javanica (62%) and N. tabacum (60%) exhibited high larval mortality at the highest concentration evaluated (10% w/v). Feeding deterrence was evaluated using glass-fibre discs treated with plant extracts, which showed that Cymbopogon citratus (36%) and Azadirachta indica (20%) were the most potent feeding deterrents among the pesticidal plants evaluated. In a screenhouse experiment where living maize plants infested with fall armyworm larvae were treated with plant extracts, N. tabacum and L. javanica were the most potent species at reducing foliar damage compared to the untreated control whilst the synthetic pesticide chlorpyrifos was the most effective in reducing fall armyworm foliar damage. Further field trial evaluation is recommended, particularly involving smallholder maize fields to assess effectiveness across a range of contexts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicotiana tabacum extract gave the highest contact-toxicity larval mortality (66%) against fall armyworm.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume1
Treatment
contact toxicity testse1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
66%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“In contact toxicity tests, the highest larval mortality was obtained from Nicotiana tabacum (66%) and Lippia javanica (66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lippia javanica extract gave the highest contact-toxicity larval mortality (66%) against fall armyworm.

Taxon
Lippia javanicaLippia javanicae1
Treatment
contact toxicity testse1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
66%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lippia javanica
Lippia javanica · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“In contact toxicity tests, the highest larval mortality was obtained from Nicotiana tabacum (66%) and Lippia javanica (66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lippia javanica caused high larval mortality (62%) in a feeding bioassay at the highest concentration tested (10% w/v).

Taxon
L. javanicaLippia javanicae2
Treatment
feeding bioassaye2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye2
Direction
highe2
Value
62%e2
Qualifier
at the highest concentration evaluated (10% w/v)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lippia javanica
Lippia javanica · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similarly, in a feeding bioassay L. javanica (62%) and N. tabacum (60%) exhibited high larval mortality at the highest concentration evaluated (10% w/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicotiana tabacum caused high larval mortality (60%) in a feeding bioassay at the highest concentration tested (10% w/v).

Taxon
N. tabacumNicotiana tabacume2
Treatment
feeding bioassaye2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye2
Direction
highe2
Value
60%e2
Qualifier
at the highest concentration evaluated (10% w/v)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similarly, in a feeding bioassay L. javanica (62%) and N. tabacum (60%) exhibited high larval mortality at the highest concentration evaluated (10% w/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymbopogon citratus extract was the most potent feeding deterrent (36%) among the pesticidal plants evaluated.

Taxon
Cymbopogon citratusCymbopogon citratuse3
Treatment
glass-fibre discs treated with plant extractse3
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
Feeding deterrencee3
Direction
most potente3
Value
36%e3
Comparator
the pesticidal plants evaluatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cymbopogon citratus
Cymbopogon citratus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryObsidian Soul · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Feeding deterrence was evaluated using glass-fibre discs treated with plant extracts, which showed that Cymbopogon citratus (36%) and Azadirachta indica (20%) were the most potent feeding deterrents among the pesticidal plants evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica extract was a potent feeding deterrent (20%) among the pesticidal plants evaluated.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicae3
Treatment
glass-fibre discs treated with plant extractse3
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
Feeding deterrencee3
Direction
most potente3
Value
20%e3
Comparator
the pesticidal plants evaluatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a recent invasive pest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Feeding deterrence was evaluated using glass-fibre discs treated with plant extracts, which showed that Cymbopogon citratus (36%) and Azadirachta indica (20%) were the most potent feeding deterrents among the pesticidal plants evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicotiana tabacum and Lippia javanica extracts were the most potent at reducing fall armyworm foliar damage on screenhouse maize compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
plant extractse4
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae4pest
Outcome
foliar damagee4
Direction
reducinge4
Qualifier
N. tabacum and L. javanica were the most potent speciese4
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In a screenhouse experiment where living maize plants infested with fall armyworm larvae were treated with plant extracts, N. tabacum and L. javanica were the most potent species at reducing foliar damage compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The synthetic pesticide chlorpyrifos was the most effective in reducing fall armyworm foliar damage on screenhouse maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
synthetic pesticide chlorpyrifose5
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae5pest
Outcome
fall armyworm foliar damagee5
Direction
most effective in reducinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In a screenhouse experiment where living maize plants infested with fall armyworm larvae were treated with plant extracts, N. tabacum and L. javanica were the most potent species at reducing foliar damage compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1937 · show in text ↑
e5

“whilst the synthetic pesticide chlorpyrifos was the most effective in reducing fall armyworm foliar damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2044 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Further field trials of pesticidal plants are recommended on smallholder maize fields to assess effectiveness across a range of contexts.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse7
Outcome
effectiveness across a range of contextse7
Setting
smallholder maize fieldse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Further field trial evaluation is recommended, particularly involving smallholder maize fields to assess effectiveness across a range of contexts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2191 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contact toxicity and feeding bioassays showed differential effects of plant species on larvae.

Taxon
plant speciese6
Outcome
differential effectse6

Verbatim

e6

“In order to optimize the use of botanical extracts for FAW control, we initially screened ten commonly used plant species. In laboratory trials, contact toxicity and feeding bioassays showed differential effects. Some plant species had little to no effect when compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some plant species had little to no effect against fall armyworm compared with untreated controls.

Taxon
plant speciese6
Treatment
botanical extractse6
Outcome
effecte6
Direction
little to no effecte6
Comparator
untreated controlse6

Verbatim

e6

“In order to optimize the use of botanical extracts for FAW control, we initially screened ten commonly used plant species. In laboratory trials, contact toxicity and feeding bioassays showed differential effects. Some plant species had little to no effect when compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1092 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Azadirachta indica (neem)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.