Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Water-Saving Irrigation Strategies in Potato Fields: Effects on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use in Arid Region

Tarek K. Zin El-Abedin; Mohamed A. Mattar; Hussein M. Al-Ghobari; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of two water-saving practices—partial root-zone drying (PRD) and deficit irrigation (DI)—on potato growth and yield in comparison with full irrigation (FI). The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants to enable 100% crop evapotranspiration, and the plants received 70% and 50% of the irrigation amount of FI for DI (DI70 and DI50) and PRD (PRD70 and PRD50), respectively. The physiological characteristics of the potatoes during the 2014–2015 seasons indicated that the relative chlorophyll contents were not significantly higher for the DI and PRD treatments than for the FI treatment. The DI50 had the lowest net photosynthesis rate (p < 0.05) while DI50 and PRD50 had significantly lower stomatal conductance (gs) values in both years. Meanwhile, the values of the PRD treatments were lower than those of DI treatments based on the transpiration rates. The xylem (abscisic acid) based on PRD50 had an average increase of 0.38 mol/m2 s due to decreasing gs values compared with other water-saving irrigation treatments. However, the FI and DI treatments had increased fresh tuber yields compared with the yields of PRD treatments. Furthermore, the PRD70 and PRD50 treatments significantly reduced the water productivity (WP) values by 30.16% and 41.32%, respectively, relative to that of FI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content of potato under deficit irrigation was not significantly higher than under full irrigation.

Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
not significantly highere1
Comparator
FI treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the relative chlorophyll contents were not significantly higher for the DI and PRD treatments than for the FI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content of potato under partial root-zone drying was not significantly higher than under full irrigation.

Treatment
PRDe1
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
not significantly highere1
Comparator
FI treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the relative chlorophyll contents were not significantly higher for the DI and PRD treatments than for the FI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DI50 had the lowest net photosynthesis rate in potato (p < 0.05).

Treatment
DI50e1
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratee1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“The DI50 had the lowest net photosynthesis rate (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DI50 had significantly lower stomatal conductance in potato in both years.

Treatment
DI50e1
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs) valuese1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“DI50 and PRD50 had significantly lower stomatal conductance (gs) values in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD50 had significantly lower stomatal conductance in potato in both years.

Treatment
PRD50e1
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs) valuese1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“DI50 and PRD50 had significantly lower stomatal conductance (gs) values in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rates of potato under PRD treatments were lower than under DI treatments.

Treatment
PRD treatmentse1
Outcome
transpiration ratese1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
DI treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the values of the PRD treatments were lower than those of DI treatments based on the transpiration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem abscisic acid under PRD50 increased by an average of 0.38 mol/m2 s, due to decreasing gs values, compared with the other water-saving irrigation treatments.

Treatment
PRD50e1
Outcome
xylem (abscisic acid)e1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.38 mol/m2 se1
Comparator
other water-saving irrigation treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“The xylem (abscisic acid) based on PRD50 had an average increase of 0.38 mol/m2 s due to decreasing gs values compared with other water-saving irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation increased fresh tuber yield of potato compared with PRD treatments.

Treatment
FIe1
Outcome
fresh tuber yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
PRD treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the FI and DI treatments had increased fresh tuber yields compared with the yields of PRD treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation increased fresh tuber yield of potato compared with PRD treatments.

Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
fresh tuber yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
PRD treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the FI and DI treatments had increased fresh tuber yields compared with the yields of PRD treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD70 significantly reduced potato water productivity by 30.16% relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
PRD70e1
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
30.16%e1
Comparator
FIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the PRD70 and PRD50 treatments significantly reduced the water productivity (WP) values by 30.16% and 41.32%, respectively, relative to that of FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD50 significantly reduced potato water productivity by 41.32% relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
PRD50e1
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
41.32%e1
Comparator
FIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The required FI amount was applied to the potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“the PRD70 and PRD50 treatments significantly reduced the water productivity (WP) values by 30.16% and 41.32%, respectively, relative to that of FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1379 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.