Paper · 2019 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Measuring and assessing the yield loss and yield loss model of green gram due to Anthracnose of green gram (Vigna radiata)

Sunita Mahapatra; Tanya Marak; Trina Sandham; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Anthracnose of green gram caused by Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus and W.D. Moore occurs severely in Indo- gangetic plains every year. Experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2013 and 2014) to assess yield losses to develop yield loss models. The linear regression models were developed by two parameters i. e. percent yield loss and avoidable yield loss as dependant variable and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) as independent variable. The two years pooled mean revealed that a drop of 0.3 to 0.33 qha-1 in pod yield and a drop of 0.16 to 0.20% in avoidable yield loss of pod yield due to every 1% increase in AUDPC. Three sprays of Propiconazole 25 EC (0.1%) at 10 days interval beginning from 20 days after sowing resulted in lowest anthracnose under moderate disease pressure and four sprays for high disease pressure resulted in highest pod yield of 5.17q/ha and 5.08q/ha respectively. Highest avoidable losses of pod yield and percent yield loss over potential yield due to anthracnose were 48.82% and 3.55% for three sprays and 49.74% and 1.77% for four sprays respectively. The result also showed that three sprays of fungicide (Propiconazole 25 EC @ 0.1%) resulted in minimizing the disease and maximizing the profit by high benefit cost ratio (B:C) ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1% increase in anthracnose AUDPC was associated with a 0.3 to 0.33 qha-1 drop in pod yield.

Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
a drope0
Value
0.3 to 0.33 qha-1e0
Qualifier
every 1% increase in AUDPCe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a drop of 0.3 to 0.33 qha-1 in pod yield and a drop of 0.16 to 0.20% in avoidable yield loss of pod yield due to every 1% increase in AUDPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1% increase in AUDPC was associated with a 0.16 to 0.20% drop in avoidable pod-yield loss.

Outcome
avoidable yield loss of pod yielde0
Direction
a drope0
Value
0.16 to 0.20%e0
Qualifier
every 1% increase in AUDPCe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a drop of 0.16 to 0.20% in avoidable yield loss of pod yield due to every 1% increase in AUDPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three propiconazole sprays gave the lowest anthracnose under moderate disease pressure.

Treatment
Three sprays of Propiconazole 25 EC (0.1%)e0
Outcome
anthracnosee0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
moderate disease pressuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of Propiconazole 25 EC (0.1%) at 10 days interval beginning from 20 days after sowing resulted in lowest anthracnose under moderate disease pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays gave the highest pod yield of 5.08q/ha under high disease pressure.

Treatment
four sprayse0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.08q/hae0
Qualifier
high disease pressuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sprays for high disease pressure resulted in highest pod yield of 5.17q/ha and 5.08q/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three propiconazole sprays minimized disease and maximized profit through a high benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
three sprays of fungicide (Propiconazole 25 EC @ 0.1%)e0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
maximizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three sprays of fungicide (Propiconazole 25 EC @ 0.1%) resulted in minimizing the disease and maximizing the profit by high benefit cost ratio (B:C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

propiconazole · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fungicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.