Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance in South Eastern, Nigeria

Akpa, Ogonnaya Esther; Udensi Ekea Udensi; Omovbude, Sunday; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize is one of the most commonly cultivated arable crops in the rain forest zone of South Eastern Nigeria. Globally soil fertility and weed pressure are the most important constraints limiting increase productivity of Maize especially in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). Unavailability and cost of inorganic fertilizer as well as cost of labour for weeding have engendered low productivity of maize. Hence this trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of maize-legume systems on weed suppression and maize performance. The trial was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria located within latitude 04°54’N and longitude 6°55’ E). The trial was conducted between April 4th and July 5th, 2017. The experiment was a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement fitted into a randomized complete block design (RCBD) consisting of 3 types of legume systems (Mucuna pruriens, Lablab purpurens and No legume) and three levels of NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer (0, 15, and 30 kg NPK/ha). The 9 treatment combinations were replicated thrice to give 27 plots. Data collected were on maize yield and yield components, weed and legume parameters at 4, 8 and 16 weeks after sowing (WAS). Result showed that legume significantly reduced weed biomass when compared to the natural fallow. The effect of weed biomass reduction was Mucuna 34.8% >Lablab 29.2%. The legume system significantly suppressed weed compared to natural fallow and the weed suppression ability average 56% and 30% respectively for Mucuna and Lablab whether or not they received NPK. Result of this trial also revealed that within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL) 26% N and 22% N can be harvested by integrating this legume cover in cropping system and that NPK application has little or no effect in the performance of these legumes. Mucuna was not sensitive to fertilizer application while Lablab responded to fertilizer application. Maize was sensitive to Mucuna due to early integration; hence, it is recommended that these legumes be integrated at six weeks after sowing maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes significantly reduced weed biomass relative to natural fallow.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
legumee0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
natural fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result showed that legume significantly reduced weed biomass when compared to the natural fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna reduced weed biomass by 34.8%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mucunae0
Outcome
weed biomass reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
34.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of weed biomass reduction was Mucuna 34.8% >Lablab 29.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab reduced weed biomass by 29.2%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Lablabe0
Outcome
weed biomass reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
29.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of weed biomass reduction was Mucuna 34.8% >Lablab 29.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna suppressed weeds by an average 56% compared with natural fallow, regardless of NPK.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mucunae0
Outcome
weed suppression abilitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
56%e0
Qualifier
whether or not they received NPKe0
Comparator
natural fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The legume system significantly suppressed weed compared to natural fallow and the weed suppression ability average 56% and 30% respectively for Mucuna and Lablab whether or not they received NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab suppressed weeds by an average 30% compared with natural fallow, regardless of NPK.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Lablabe0
Outcome
weed suppression abilitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
whether or not they received NPKe0
Comparator
natural fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The legume system significantly suppressed weed compared to natural fallow and the weed suppression ability average 56% and 30% respectively for Mucuna and Lablab whether or not they received NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The legume cover yielded 26% N within eight weeks after sowing.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
26% Ne0
Qualifier
within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result of this trial also revealed that within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL) 26% N and 22% N can be harvested by integrating this legume cover in cropping system and that NPK application has little or no effect in the performance of these legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The legume cover yielded 22% N within eight weeks after sowing.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
22% Ne0
Qualifier
within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result of this trial also revealed that within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL) 26% N and 22% N can be harvested by integrating this legume cover in cropping system and that NPK application has little or no effect in the performance of these legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK had little or no effect on legume performance.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NPK applicatione0
Outcome
performance of these legumese0
Direction
little or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result of this trial also revealed that within 8 weeks after sowing legumes (8 WASL) 26% N and 22% N can be harvested by integrating this legume cover in cropping system and that NPK application has little or no effect in the performance of these legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna was not sensitive to fertilizer application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
Mucuna was not sensitivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mucuna was not sensitive to fertilizer application while Lablab responded to fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab responded to fertilizer application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
Lablab respondede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mucuna was not sensitive to fertilizer application while Lablab responded to fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize was sensitive to early Mucuna integration.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Maize was sensitive to Mucunae0
Qualifier
early integratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize was sensitive to Mucuna due to early integration; hence, it is recommended that these legumes be integrated at six weeks after sowing maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–2085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating the legumes six weeks after sowing maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
these legumes be integrated at six weeks after sowing maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize was sensitive to Mucuna due to early integration; hence, it is recommended that these legumes be integrated at six weeks after sowing maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–2085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize –Legume Intercrop and Fertilizer on Weed Suppression and Maize Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–90 · show in text ↑

Mucuna · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.