Paper · 2019 · Egyptian Journal of Soil Science

Response of Jerusalem artichoke Plants Grown under Saline Calcareous soil to Application of Different Combined Organic Manures

Ahmed Awad; Hoda Ahmed

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were successfully carried out to evaluate the potential influences of three organic manure (farmyard, FYM, poultry, PLM, and pigeon PGM) applied in different combinations on growth and tuber yield, and biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants. The results indicated that organic treatments improved all tested parameters, with different degrees, compared to the control. In the first season (2016/2017), the combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2) produced the highest values of No. of leaves, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights, tuber fresh and dry weights, and tuber nitrogen content. The combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLM) treatment (T6) produced the highest values of plant height, No. of lateral shoots, tuber phosphorus, cadmium and nickel content. While combined FYM + PLM treatment (T1), produced the highest values of leaf nitrogen content and total yield. While, the combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) showed the best number of lateral shoots, leaf fresh and dry weights, tuber fresh weight and total tuber yield, leaf phosphorus and tuber nitrogen contents in the second season (2017/2018). However, the combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3) produced the highest values of total phenolic compounds, leaf phosphorus and tuber potassium contents, and the combined PGM + ½FYM + ½PLMtreatment (T6) was the best for inulin percentage in both seasons. The results of this study recommend using organic fertilizers, especially the combined T1 or T4 for Jerusalem artichoke.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatments improved all tested parameters compared with the control.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
organic treatmentse1
Outcome
all tested parameterse1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic treatments improved all tested parameters, with different degrees, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season the combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2) gave the highest number of leaves, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
leaf and steme2
Treatment
combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2)e2
Outcome
No. of leaves, leaf and stem fresh and dry weightse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2) produced the highest values of No. of leaves, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season the combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2) gave the highest tuber fresh and dry weights and tuber nitrogen content.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
tubere3
Treatment
combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2)e3
Outcome
tuber fresh and dry weights, and tuber nitrogen contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combined PLM + PGM treatment (T2) produced the highest values of No. of leaves, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights, tuber fresh and dry weights, and tuber nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLM treatment (T6) gave the highest plant height and number of lateral shoots.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLMe4
Outcome
plant height, No. of lateral shootse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“The combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLM) treatment (T6) produced the highest values of plant height, No. of lateral shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLM treatment (T6) gave the highest tuber phosphorus, cadmium and nickel content.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
tubere5
Treatment
combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLMe5
Outcome
tuber phosphorus, cadmium and nickel contente5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The combined PGM + ½ FYM + ½ PLM) treatment (T6) produced the highest values of plant height, No. of lateral shoots, tuber phosphorus, cadmium and nickel content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + PLM treatment (T1) gave the highest leaf nitrogen content and total yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
leafe6
Treatment
combined FYM + PLM treatment (T1)e6
Outcome
leaf nitrogen content and total yielde6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“While combined FYM + PLM treatment (T1), produced the highest values of leaf nitrogen content and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) gave the best number of lateral shoots and leaf fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Treatment
combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4)e7
Outcome
number of lateral shoots, leaf fresh and dry weightse7
Direction
beste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e7

“the combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) showed the best number of lateral shoots, leaf fresh and dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) gave the best tuber fresh weight and total tuber yield.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
tubere2
Treatment
combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4)e2
Outcome
tuber fresh weight and total tuber yielde2
Direction
beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) showed the best number of lateral shoots, leaf fresh and dry weights, tuber fresh weight and total tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) gave the best leaf phosphorus and tuber nitrogen contents.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4)e3
Outcome
leaf phosphorus and tuber nitrogen contentse3
Direction
beste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combined FYM + ½ PLM + ½ PGM treatment (T4) showed the best number of lateral shoots, leaf fresh and dry weights, tuber fresh weight and total tuber yield, leaf phosphorus and tuber nitrogen contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3) gave the highest total phenolic compounds.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3)e4
Outcome
total phenolic compoundse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3) produced the highest values of total phenolic compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3) gave the highest leaf phosphorus and tuber potassium contents.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
leafe5
Treatment
combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3)e5
Outcome
leaf phosphorus and tuber potassium contentse5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“the combined FYM + PGM treatment (T3) produced the highest values of total phenolic compounds, leaf phosphorus and tuber potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined PGM + ½FYM + ½PLM treatment (T6) gave the best inulin percentage in both seasons.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
combined PGM + ½FYM + ½PLMtreatment (T6)e6
Outcome
inulin percentagee6
Direction
beste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical constituents of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combined PGM + ½FYM + ½PLMtreatment (T6) was the best for inulin percentage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend organic fertilizers, especially the combined T1 or T4, for Jerusalem artichoke.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse7
Outcome
using organic fertilizerse7
Qualifier
especially the combined T1 or T4e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The results of this study recommend using organic fertilizers, especially the combined T1 or T4 for Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1533 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.