Abstract
An experiment was carried out to find out suitable method of planting and weed management in green gram grown during the kharif season of 2014 and 2015. The density of E. colona and C. rotundus was significantly reduced in raised bed planting method. Significant reduction in total dry weight of weeds was obtained in raised bed planting method as compared to conventional and zero till planting method. Maximum weed control efficiency was found in raised bed planting method. Significantly more number of seeds pod-1 were observed in raised bed planting method as compared to conventional and zero till planting method. Seed yield and straw yield were found maximum in raised bed planting method during both years of study and were statistically at par in conventional and zero till planting method. Harvest index was not influenced by planting methods. Phytotoxicity on crop due to different herbicides was similar under different planting methods. Among different weed management treatments, HW at 15 and 30 DAS was found most effective in reducing density and dry weight of weeds during crop growing period except at 15 DAS (where weeding was done after taking observation). Maximum weed control efficiency was observed in HW (15 and 30 DAS). Weedy check treatment resulted in minimum while weed free treatment resulted in maximum number of seeds pod-1. Among the treatments having herbicide application, post emergence application of Imazethapyr @ 100 g ha-1 resulted in maximum seed and stover yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly reduced E. colona density.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Interactor
- E. colonae0weed
- Outcome
- density of E. colonae0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The density of E. colona and C. rotundus was significantly reduced in raised bed planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly reduced C. rotundus density.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Interactor
- C. rotunduse0weed
- Outcome
- density of E. colona and C. rotunduse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The density of E. colona and C. rotundus was significantly reduced in raised bed planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly reduced total weed dry weight compared with conventional and zero till planting.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- total dry weight of weedse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- conventional and zero till planting methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant reduction in total dry weight of weeds was obtained in raised bed planting method as compared to conventional and zero till planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds had maximum weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum weed control efficiency was found in raised bed planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds had significantly more seeds per pod than conventional and zero till planting.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- number of seeds pod-1e0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- conventional and zero till planting methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly more number of seeds pod-1 were observed in raised bed planting method as compared to conventional and zero till planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds produced maximum seed and straw yield in both years.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- raised bed planting methode0
- Outcome
- Seed yield and straw yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- during both years of studye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed yield and straw yield were found maximum in raised bed planting method during both years of study”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional and zero till planting had statistically similar seed and straw yields.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- conventional and zero till planting methode0
- Outcome
- Seed yield and straw yielde0
- Direction
- statistically at pare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed yield and straw yield were found maximum in raised bed planting method during both years of study and were statistically at par in conventional and zero till planting method”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting method did not influence harvest index.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- planting methodse0
- Outcome
- Harvest indexe0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Harvest index was not influenced by planting methods”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide phytotoxicity was similar across planting methods.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- different herbicidese0
- Outcome
- Phytotoxicity on crope0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- different planting methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phytotoxicity on crop due to different herbicides was similar under different planting methods”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAS most effectively reduced weed density and dry weight, apart from the observation at 15 DAS.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- HW at 15 and 30 DASe0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- density and dry weight of weedse0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Qualifier
- except at 15 DASe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“HW at 15 and 30 DAS was found most effective in reducing density and dry weight of weeds during crop growing period except at 15 DAS”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAS had maximum weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- HW (15 and 30 DAS)e0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum weed control efficiency was observed in HW (15 and 30 DAS)”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
The weedy check had minimum seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- Weedy check treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of seeds pod-1e0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weedy check treatment resulted in minimum while weed free treatment resulted in maximum number of seeds pod-1”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
The weed free treatment had maximum seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- weed free treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of seeds pod-1e0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weed free treatment resulted in maximum number of seeds pod-1”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
Claim · model-written summary
Post emergence Imazethapyr at 100 g ha-1 gave maximum seed and stover yield among herbicide treatments.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- post emergence application of Imazethapyr @ 100 g ha-1e0
- Outcome
- seed and stover yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- treatments having herbicide applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the treatments having herbicide application, post emergence application of Imazethapyr @ 100 g ha-1 resulted in maximum seed and stover yield”
t0“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →tillage · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.