Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAS most effectively reduced weed density and dry weight, apart from the observation at 15 DAS.

A claim from Effect of planting methods and weed management practices on yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}, weed dynamics vis a vis phytotoxicity in green gram · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 15 and 30 DAS most effectively reduced weed density and dry weight, apart from the observation at 15 DAS.

Treatment
HW at 15 and 30 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
except at 15 DASe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HW at 15 and 30 DAS was found most effective in reducing density and dry weight of weeds during crop growing period except at 15 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1127
t0

“yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–111

Title

Effect of planting methods and weed management practices on yield of green gram {Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek}, weed dynamics vis a vis phytotoxicity in green gram

Rekha Yadav; Satish Kumar; Anil Kumar Dhaka; et al. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2019. doi:10.18805/a-4976

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-8f1e6de7ca1a4ddf4dcd2aafa784dc9ea2601b6073c36f89fb318c85e807bd7f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer