Paper · 2019 · Pest Management Science

Evaluation of new chemical and biological nematicides for managing Meloidogyne javanica in tomato production and associated double‐crops in Florida

Johan A Desaeger; Tristan T Watson

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two field experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy and field performance of three new non-fumigant chemical nematicides (fluensulfone, fluopyram, and fluazaindolizine) and two biological nematicides (Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 and Purpureocillium lilacinus strain 251) for management of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica) on tomato and associated double-crops in Florida. RESULTS: In experiment 1, soil fumigation with metam potassium increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 77% relative to that of the untreated soil. All non-fumigant chemical nematicides reduced root galling on tomato (47-85% reduction); however, only fluensulfone showed a trend towards yield enhancement. In experiment 2, soil fumigation with chloropicrin increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 35% relative to that of the untreated soil; however, end-of-season populations of M. javanica in soil were larger than that of the non-fumigated soil. Fluensulfone showed a trend towards reduced root galling and enhanced fruit yield, whereas other non-fumigant nematicides did not. Double-cropped cucumber was 69% more galled when planted into soil previously fumigated with chloropicrin relative to that of untreated soil, and also showed reduced plant vigor and fruit yield. CONCLUSION: Fluensulfone shows significant potential to be a component of an integrated pest management strategy for tomato in Florida. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metam potassium increased tomato growth relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
soil fumigation with metam potassiume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fumigation with metam potassium increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 77% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metam potassium reduced tomato root galling by 77% relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
soil fumigation with metam potassiume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
Outcome
root galling on tomatoe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
77%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fumigation with metam potassium increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 77% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All non-fumigant chemical nematicides reduced tomato root galling by 47-85%.

Treatment
non-fumigant chemical nematicidese0
Outcome
root galling on tomatoe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47-85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All non-fumigant chemical nematicides reduced root galling on tomato (47-85% reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only fluensulfone showed a trend toward increased tomato yield in experiment 1.

Treatment
fluensulfonee0
Outcome
yield enhancemente0
Direction
enhancemente0
Qualifier
trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only fluensulfone showed a trend towards yield enhancement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin increased tomato plant growth in experiment 2.

Treatment
soil fumigation with chloropicrine0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fumigation with chloropicrin increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 35% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin reduced tomato root galling by 35% in experiment 2.

Treatment
soil fumigation with chloropicrine0
Outcome
root galling on tomatoe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fumigation with chloropicrin increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 35% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-season soil M. javanica populations were larger after chloropicrin than in non-fumigated soil.

Treatment
chloropicrine1
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Outcome
populations of M. javanica in soile0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
non-fumigated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“end-of-season populations of M. javanica in soil were larger than that of the non-fumigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil fumigation with chloropicrin increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 35% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluensulfone showed a trend toward reduced tomato root galling in experiment 2.

Treatment
Fluensulfonee0
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluensulfone showed a trend towards reduced root galling and enhanced fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluensulfone showed a trend toward enhanced tomato fruit yield in experiment 2.

Treatment
Fluensulfonee0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluensulfone showed a trend towards reduced root galling and enhanced fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other non-fumigant nematicides did not show these trends.

Outcome
other non-fumigant nematicides did note0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other non-fumigant nematicides did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber was 69% more galled in soil previously fumigated with chloropicrin than in untreated soil.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
soil previously fumigated with chloropicrine0
Outcome
cucumber was 69% more gallede0
Direction
more gallede0
Value
69%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double-cropped cucumber was 69% more galled when planted into soil previously fumigated with chloropicrin relative to that of untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber vigor and fruit yield declined after prior chloropicrin fumigation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
chloropicrine1
Outcome
plant vigor and fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and also showed reduced plant vigor and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Double-cropped cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil fumigation with chloropicrin increased plant growth and reduced root galling on tomato by 35% relative to that of the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered fluensulfone a promising component of integrated pest management for tomato in Florida.

Treatment
Fluensulfonee0
Outcome
component of an integrated pest management strategye0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluensulfone shows significant potential to be a component of an integrated pest management strategy for tomato in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1462 · show in text ↑

chloropicrin · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fluensulfone · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chloropicrin · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fluensulfone · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · organism · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

insecticide · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 36 positive, 9 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.