Paper · 2019 · Natural Product Communications

Composition and Chemical Variability of Myrtus communis Leaf Oil From Northwestern Algeria

Chahrazed Bekhechi; Charaf Eddine Watheq Malti; Maghnia Boussaïd; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Myrtus communis L. is a shrub growing wild in most countries all around the Mediterranean Sea and myrtle leaf oil is useful in the perfumery and pharmaceutical industries. Nowadays, “chemotyped” essential oils are more and more appreciated. Myrtle oil from eastern and central-north Algeria belong to the “α-pinene-cineole” chemotype. In contrast, Moroccan myrtle oil displayed appreciable content of myrtenyl acetate. Therefore, it appeared crucial to investigate the composition of myrtle leaf oil from northwestern Algeria in order to ensure the homogeneity of the composition of Algerian myrtle leaf oil. The chemical composition of 42 oil samples of M. communis isolated from leaves collected in five locations from Tlemcen Province was investigated by gas chromatography (GC) in combination with retention indices, GC-mass spectroscopy, and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Yields ranged between 0.13% and 1.04% (w/w). The chemical composition of the oils was largely dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons, with α-pinene (24.3-59.0%) and 1,8-cineole (13.2-49.5%) being the major compounds followed by limonene (3.2-19.8%). The 42 compositions were submitted to statistical analyses. The combination of hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis allowed the distinction of two groups, the second group being subdivided into two subgroups. Groups and subgroups were differentiated with respect to their contents of α-pinene and 1,8-cineole and, to a lesser extent, of limonene. This study ensures that Algerian myrtle leaf oil belongs to the “α-pinene-cineole” chemotype which displays various biological activities. The observed homogeneity could be a positive point to join the international market of essential oils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf oil yields ranged from 0.13% to 1.04%.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Value
0.13% and 1.04% (w/w)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields ranged between 0.13% and 1.04% (w/w)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oils were dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical composition of the oils was largely dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

α-pinene was a major leaf oil constituent at 24.3-59.0%.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
α-pinenee0
Value
24.3-59.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“α-pinene (24.3-59.0%) and 1,8-cineole (13.2-49.5%) being the major compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1,8-cineole was a major leaf oil constituent at 13.2-49.5%.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
1,8-cineolee0
Value
13.2-49.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1,8-cineole (13.2-49.5%) being the major compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limonene followed the major compounds at 3.2-19.8%.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
limonenee0
Value
3.2-19.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by limonene (3.2-19.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Statistical analysis distinguished two oil composition groups, with the second subdivided into two subgroups.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Outcome
two groups, the second group being subdivided into two subgroupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed the distinction of two groups, the second group being subdivided into two subgroups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The groups differed in α-pinene and 1,8-cineole content, and less in limonene content.

Taxon
Myrtus communisMyrtus communist0
Material
Groups and subgroupse0
Outcome
contents of α-pinene and 1,8-cineole and, to a lesser extent, of limonenee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groups and subgroups were differentiated with respect to their contents of α-pinene and 1,8-cineole and, to a lesser extent, of limonene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Algerian leaf oil was assigned to the α-pinene-cineole chemotype.

Taxon
myrtlee0
Outcome
belongs to the “α-pinene-cineole” chemotypee0

Verbatim

e0

“Algerian myrtle leaf oil belongs to the “α-pinene-cineole” chemotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1607 · show in text ↑