Paper · 1986 · Weed Science

Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield

Ahmed D. Ali; T. Eugene Reagan; Lynn M. Kitchen; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of johnsongrass [ Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHA] infestations were determined during a 2-yr study on sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L. ‘CP-65-357’) yield. Both cane and sugar yields were lower (36 and 31%, respectively) in plots heavily infested with johnsongrass than in weed-free plots. Sugarcane yields were inversely influenced by johnsongrass equivalents (the sum of the values obtained by multiplying the number of clumps by their corresponding importance value for each plot). In 1983, both johnsongrass standing crop and johnsongrass equivalents correlated negatively with cane yield much better than any other factor combinations, while in 1984, the same was true for stalk population. Substantial yield reductions from johnsongrass interference were observed at johnsongrass infestation levels higher than 15 to 35%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield was lower in plots heavily infested with johnsongrass than in weed-free plots.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
heavily infested with johnsongrasse1
Interactor
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense)Sorghum halepenset0weed
Outcome
cane and sugar yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
36e1
Comparator
weed-free plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both cane and sugar yields were lower (36 and 31%, respectively) in plots heavily infested with johnsongrass than in weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield was lower in plots heavily infested with johnsongrass than in weed-free plots.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
heavily infested with johnsongrasse1
Interactor
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense)Sorghum halepenset0weed
Outcome
cane and sugar yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
31%e1
Comparator
weed-free plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both cane and sugar yields were lower (36 and 31%, respectively) in plots heavily infested with johnsongrass than in weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–309 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane yields were inversely influenced by johnsongrass equivalents.

Taxon
Sugarcanee2
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee2weedt0
Outcome
Sugarcane yieldse2
Direction
inversely influencede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sugarcane yields were inversely influenced by johnsongrass equivalents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–381 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1983, johnsongrass standing crop and johnsongrass equivalents correlated negatively with cane yield better than other factor combinations.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee3weedt0
Outcome
cane yielde3
Direction
correlated negativelye3
Qualifier
In 1983e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1983, both johnsongrass standing crop and johnsongrass equivalents correlated negatively with cane yield much better than any other factor combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–660 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1984, johnsongrass stalk population correlated negatively with cane yield better than other factor combinations.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee3weedt0
Outcome
stalk populatione3
Direction
correlated negativelye3
Qualifier
while in 1984e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1983, both johnsongrass standing crop and johnsongrass equivalents correlated negatively with cane yield much better than any other factor combinations, while in 1984, the same was true for stalk population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–715 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substantial sugarcane yield reductions occurred at johnsongrass infestation levels higher than 15 to 35%.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee5weedt0
Outcome
yield reductionse5
Value
15 to 35%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density on Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Substantial yield reductions from johnsongrass interference were observed at johnsongrass infestation levels higher than 15 to 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–847 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.