Paper · 2019 · Weed Technology

The effect of cotton growth stage on response to a sublethal concentration of 2,4-D

John T. Buol; Daniel B. Reynolds; Darrin M. Dodds; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Recent commercialization of auxin herbicide–based weed control systems has led to increased off-target exposure of susceptible cotton cultivars to auxin herbicides. Off-target deposition of dilute concentrations of auxin herbicides can occur on cotton at any stage of growth. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Mississippi from 2014 to 2016 to assess the response of cotton at various growth stages after exposure to a sublethal 2,4-D concentration of 8.3 g ae ha −1 . Herbicide applications occurred weekly from 0 to 14 weeks after emergence (WAE). Cotton exposure to 2,4-D at 2 to 9 WAE resulted in up to 64% visible injury, whereas 2,4-D exposure 5 to 6 WAE resulted in machine-harvested yield reductions of 18% to 21%. Cotton maturity was delayed after exposure 2 to 10 WAE, and height was increased from exposure 6 to 9 WAE due to decreased fruit set after exposure. Total hand-harvested yield was reduced from 2,4-D exposure 3, 5 to 8, and 13 WAE. Growth stage at time of exposure influenced the distribution of yield by node and position. Yield on lower and inner fruiting sites generally decreased from exposure, and yield partitioned to vegetative or aborted positions and upper fruiting sites increased. Reductions in gin turnout, micronaire, fiber length, fiber-length uniformity, and fiber elongation were observed after exposure at certain growth stages, but the overall effects on fiber properties were small. These results indicate that cotton is most sensitive to low concentrations of 2,4-D during late vegetative and squaring growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton visible injury resulted in after sublethal 2,4-D exposure at 2 to 9 WAE.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
visible injurye0
Direction
resulted ine0
Value
up to 64%e0
Qualifier
2 to 9 WAEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton exposure to 2,4-D at 2 to 9 WAE resulted in up to 64% visible injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton machine-harvested yield reductions reductions after sublethal 2,4-D exposure at 5 to 6 WAE.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
machine-harvested yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
18% to 21%e0
Qualifier
5 to 6 WAEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D exposure 5 to 6 WAE resulted in machine-harvested yield reductions of 18% to 21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton maturity delayed after sublethal 2,4-D exposure at 2 to 10 WAE.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
2 to 10 WAEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton maturity was delayed after exposure 2 to 10 WAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton height increased after sublethal 2,4-D exposure at 6 to 9 WAE.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
6 to 9 WAEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“height was increased from exposure 6 to 9 WAE due to decreased fruit set after exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton Total hand-harvested yield reduced after sublethal 2,4-D exposure at 3, 5 to 8, and 13 WAE.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
Total hand-harvested yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
3, 5 to 8, and 13 WAEe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total hand-harvested yield was reduced from 2,4-D exposure 3, 5 to 8, and 13 WAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton Yield on lower and inner fruiting sites decreased after sublethal 2,4-D exposure.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
Yield on lower and inner fruiting sitese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield on lower and inner fruiting sites generally decreased from exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield partitioned to vegetative or aborted positions and upper fruiting sites increased after sublethal 2,4-D exposure.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
yield partitioned to vegetative or aborted positions and upper fruiting sitese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield partitioned to vegetative or aborted positions and upper fruiting sites increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton gin turnout, micronaire, fiber length Reductions after sublethal 2,4-D exposure.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
gin turnout, micronaire, fiber lengthe0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in gin turnout, micronaire, fiber length, fiber-length uniformity, and fiber elongation were observed after exposure at certain growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton fiber-length uniformity, and fiber elongation Reductions after sublethal 2,4-D exposure.

Treatment
2,4-De1
Outcome
fiber-length uniformity, and fiber elongatione0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in gin turnout, micronaire, fiber length, fiber-length uniformity, and fiber elongation were observed after exposure at certain growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

2,4-D · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

2,4-D · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

2,4-D · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.