Paper · 2019 · Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

Modeling water and heat transfer in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum applied to maize growth under plastic film mulching

Meng DUAN; Jin XIE; Xiaomin MAO

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Based on our previous work modeling crop growth (CropSPAC) and water and heat transfer in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC), the model was improved by considering the effect of plastic film mulching applied to field-grown maize in North-west China. In CropSPAC, a single layer canopy model and a multi-layer soil model were adopted to simulate the energy partition between the canopy and water and heat transfer in the soil, respectively. The maize growth module included photosynthesis, growth stage calculation, biomass accumulation, and participation. The CropSPAC model coupled the maize growth module and SPAC water and heat transfer module through leaf area index (LAI), plant height and soil moisture condition in the root zone. The LAI and plant height were calculated from the maize growth module and used as input for the SPAC water and heat transfer module, and the SPAC module output for soil water stress conditions used as an input for maize growth module. We used rs, the representation of evaporation resistance, instead of the commonly used evaporation resistance rs0 to reflect the change of latent heat flux of soil evaporation under film mulching as well as the induced change in energy partition. The model was tested in a maize field at Yingke irrigation area in North-west China. Results showed reasonable agreement between the simulations and measurements of LAI, above-ground biomass and soil water content. Compared with the original model, the modified model was more reliable for maize growth simulation under film mulching and showed better accuracy for the LAI (with the coefficient of determination R2 = 0.92, the root mean square of error RMSE= 1.23, and the Nush-Suttclife efficiency Ens = 0.87), the above-ground biomass (with R2 = 0.96, RMSE= 7.17 t·ha−1 and Ens = 0.95) and the soil water content in 0–1 m soil layer (with R2 = 0.78, RMSE= 49.44 mm and Ens = 0.26). Scenarios were considered to simulate the influence of future climate change and film mulching on crop growth, soil water and heat conditions, and crop yield. The simulations indicated that the change of LAI, leaf biomass and yield are negatively correlated with temperature change, but the growing degree-days, evaporation, soil water content and soil temperature are positively correlated with temperature change. With an increase in the ratio of film mulching area, the evaporation will decrease, while the impact of film mulching on crop transpiration is not significant. In general, film mulching is effective in saving water, preserving soil moisture, increasing soil surface temperature, shortening the potential growth period, and increasing the potential yield of maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modified CropSPAC agreed reasonably with measured maize leaf area index, above-ground biomass, and soil water content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
reasonable agreement between the simulations and measurements of LAI, above-ground biomass and soil water contente0
Comparator
measurementse0
Setting
Yingke irrigation area in North-west Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed reasonable agreement between the simulations and measurements of LAI, above-ground biomass and soil water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize field at Yingke irrigation area in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1310 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modified model accuracy for maize LAI exceeded the original model, with R2 0.92, RMSE 1.23, and Ens 0.87.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
accuracy for the LAIe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
R2 = 0.92e0
Qualifier
RMSE= 1.23e0
Comparator
original modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the original model, the modified model was more reliable for maize growth simulation under film mulching and showed better accuracy for the LAI (with the coefficient of determination R2 = 0.92, the root mean square of error RMSE= 1.23, and the Nush-Suttclife efficiency Ens = 0.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1737 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modified model accuracy for above-ground biomass exceeded the original model, with R2 0.96, RMSE 7.17 t·ha−1, and Ens 0.95.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
above-ground biomasse0
Direction
bettere1
Value
RMSE= 7.17 t·ha−1e0
Comparator
original modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the above-ground biomass (with R2 = 0.96, RMSE= 7.17 t·ha−1 and Ens = 0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the original model, the modified model was more reliable for maize growth simulation under film mulching and showed better accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1587 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modified model accuracy for soil water content exceeded the original model, with R2 0.78, RMSE 49.44 mm, and Ens 0.26.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
soil water content in 0–1 m soil layere0
Direction
bettere1
Value
RMSE= 49.44 mme0
Comparator
original modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil water content in 0–1 m soil layer (with R2 = 0.78, RMSE= 49.44 mm and Ens = 0.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1909 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the original model, the modified model was more reliable for maize growth simulation under film mulching and showed better accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1587 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

In simulated climate scenarios, maize LAI, leaf biomass, and yield were negatively correlated with temperature change.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
temperature changee0
Outcome
change of LAI, leaf biomass and yielde0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the change of LAI, leaf biomass and yield are negatively correlated with temperature change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2101–2192 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown maize in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Growing degree-days, evaporation, soil water content, and soil temperature were positively correlated with temperature change in simulations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
temperature changee0
Outcome
growing degree-days, evaporation, soil water content and soil temperaturee0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growing degree-days, evaporation, soil water content and soil temperature are positively correlated with temperature change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2198–2325 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown maize in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing film mulching area reduced simulated evaporation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
ratio of film mulching areae0
Outcome
evaporatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in the ratio of film mulching area, the evaporation will decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2327–2409 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown maize in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)projected

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching had no significant effect on simulated crop transpiration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
film mulchinge0
Outcome
crop transpiratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the impact of film mulching on crop transpiration is not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2417–2485 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown maize in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching was judged effective for water saving and soil moisture preservation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
film mulchinge0
Outcome
saving water, preserving soil moisturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“film mulching is effective in saving water, preserving soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2499–2567 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown maize in North-west China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching was judged to increase soil surface temperature and potential maize yield while shortening the potential growth period.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
film mulchinge0
Outcome
increasing soil surface temperature, shortening the potential growth period, and increasing the potential yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“film mulching is effective in saving water, preserving soil moisture, increasing soil surface temperature, shortening the potential growth period, and increasing the potential yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2499–2690 · show in text ↑

mulching · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.