Paper · 1970 · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity

Tropical peatland tree-species diversity altered by forest degradation

DWI ASTIANI

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Astiani D. 2016. Tropical peatland tree-species diversity altered by forest degradation. Biodiversitas 17: 102-109. Indonesianexperienced relatively high deforestation and degradation. The forests degradation could bring the forests into a temporary or might bepermanent destruction not only in forest vegetation density and structure, but also in species composition. A study had been carried outto examined the impact of peatland forests degradation on their species diversity composition in Ketapang, West Kalimantan peatlandforest. Stratified random sampling was used to distinguished forest degradation class (low, intermediate and high degradation levels)Â based on the differences in spectra image and confirmed with field checking by measuring forest canopy opening to measure thedegradation levels. Six to twelve of a 20x100m plots were established to sample tree structure and composition distributed alongpeatland landscape. All trees species diameter >5cm was registered an species identified. Results indicated that tree diversity wassignificantly reduce due to forest degradation, in low, intermediate, and high degraded forest were 82, 72, and 48 consecutively. Forestdegradation is not only resulted more than 50% of important species loss in high degraded peatland forest but also reducing ~40% treeabundance. Ten species were found in high degraded forest, e.g., Calophylum inophyllum, Cyathocalyx biovulatus, Neoscortechiniakingii, and Eugenia cerina, were not present in low degraded one. The species composition and abundance shifting due to forestdegradation should be considered on peatland forest management to hinder permanent species loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree diversity was significantly reduced by forest degradation; it was 82 in the low degradation class of peatland forest in Ketapang, West Kalimantan.

Taxon
treee0
Treatment
forest degradatione0
Outcome
tree diversitye0
Direction
reducee0
Value
82e0
Qualifier
lowe0
Setting
Ketapang, West Kalimantane1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tree diversity wassignificantly reduce due to forest degradation, in low, intermediate, and high degraded forest were 82, 72, and 48 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ketapang, West Kalimantan peatlandforest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree diversity was significantly reduced by forest degradation; it was 72 in the intermediate degradation class of peatland forest in Ketapang, West Kalimantan.

Taxon
treee0
Treatment
forest degradatione0
Outcome
tree diversitye0
Direction
reducee0
Value
72e0
Qualifier
intermediatee0
Setting
Ketapang, West Kalimantane1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tree diversity wassignificantly reduce due to forest degradation, in low, intermediate, and high degraded forest were 82, 72, and 48 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ketapang, West Kalimantan peatlandforest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree diversity was significantly reduced by forest degradation; it was 48 in the high degradation class of peatland forest in Ketapang, West Kalimantan.

Taxon
treee0
Treatment
forest degradatione0
Outcome
tree diversitye0
Direction
reducee0
Value
48e0
Qualifier
highe0
Setting
Ketapang, West Kalimantane1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tree diversity wassignificantly reduce due to forest degradation, in low, intermediate, and high degraded forest were 82, 72, and 48 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ketapang, West Kalimantan peatlandforest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forest degradation caused more than 50% loss of important species in highly degraded peatland forest.

Taxon
tree-speciest0
Treatment
Forestdegradatione0
Outcome
important species losse0
Direction
more than 50%e0
Value
more than 50%e0
Qualifier
high degraded peatland foreste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“tree-species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Forestdegradation is not only resulted more than 50% of important species loss in high degraded peatland forest but also reducing ~40% treeabundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forest degradation reduced tree abundance by about 40%.

Taxon
tree-speciest0
Treatment
Forestdegradatione0
Outcome
treeabundancee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
~40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“tree-species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Forestdegradation is not only resulted more than 50% of important species loss in high degraded peatland forest but also reducing ~40% treeabundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten species found in highly degraded forest, including Calophylum inophyllum, Cyathocalyx biovulatus, Neoscortechinia kingii and Eugenia cerina, were not present in low degraded forest.

Taxon
Calophylum inophyllum, Cyathocalyx biovulatus, Neoscortechiniakingii, and Eugenia cerinae0
Outcome
were not present in low degraded onee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Ten species were found in high degraded forest, e.g., Calophylum inophyllum, Cyathocalyx biovulatus, Neoscortechiniakingii, and Eugenia cerina, were not present in low degraded one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that species composition and abundance shifts due to forest degradation be considered in peatland forest management to prevent permanent species loss.

Taxon
tree-speciest0
Outcome
should be considered on peatland forest managemente0

Verbatim

t0

“tree-species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“The species composition and abundance shifting due to forest degradation should be considered on peatland forest management to hinder permanent species loss”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1509–1664 · show in text ↑