Paper · 2013 · Nigerian Journal of Soil Science

Effect of Tillage, Poultry Manure and Npk Fertilizer on Soil Chemical Properties and Maize Yield on an Alfisol at Abeokuta, South - Western Nigeria

M.A. Busari; F.K. Salako

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tillage is a basic soil management tool that significantly affects soil characteristics and plant development. This study examined the 2-year effects of tillage, poultry manure (PM) and NPK 20:10:10 fertilizer on soil chemical properties and maize yield. The experiment was a split-split- plot design with three replications. Tillage (zero tillage (ZT), minimum tillage (MT) and conventional tillage (CT)) was the main plot, the sub-plot comprised three PM treatments (0, 10 and 20 Mg ha-1) while the sub-sub-plot was NPK 20:10:10 fertilizer (applied at 0, 90, 120 and 150 kg N ha-1). At harvest, routine soil chemical properties, maize grain yield and yield parameters were measured. Soil chemical qualities were significantly higher under conservation tillage (ZT and MT) than CT with or without PM treatment and such increments were higher with NPK plus PM than their separate use. The soil organic carbon was higher by 28% and 20% under ZT and MT, respectively compared with CT in 2008 and 79% (ZT) and 65% (MT) compared with CT in 2009. Maize grain yields of 1.61 Mg ha-1 (2008) and 2.28 Mg ha-1 (2009) under MT were significantly higher than the yields from ZT and CT. Application of NPK plus PM resulted in 18-53% grain yield increments compared with their separate use under the three tillage systems. Therefore, improved soil chemical qualities and higher maize production can be achieved when organic and inorganic fertilizers are jointly applied than their separate use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage had higher soil chemical qualities than conventional tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conservation tillage (ZT and MT)e0
Outcome
Soil chemical qualitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chemical qualities were significantly higher under conservation tillage (ZT and MT) than CT with or without PM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK and poultry manure raised soil chemical qualities more than separate use.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NPK plus PMe0
Outcome
incrementse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
their separate usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such increments were higher with NPK plus PM than their separate use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage raised soil organic carbon by 28% versus conventional tillage in 2008.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil organic carbon was higher by 28% and 20% under ZT and MT, respectively compared with CT in 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage raised soil organic carbon by 20% versus conventional tillage in 2008.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil organic carbon was higher by 28% and 20% under ZT and MT, respectively compared with CT in 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage raised soil organic carbon by 79% versus conventional tillage in 2009.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
79%e0
Qualifier
2009e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil organic carbon was higher by 28% and 20% under ZT and MT, respectively compared with CT in 2008 and 79% (ZT) and 65% (MT) compared with CT in 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage raised soil organic carbon by 65% versus conventional tillage in 2009.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
65%e0
Qualifier
2009e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil organic carbon was higher by 28% and 20% under ZT and MT, respectively compared with CT in 2008 and 79% (ZT) and 65% (MT) compared with CT in 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage maize grain yield was 1.61 Mg ha-1 in 2008 and exceeded zero and conventional tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.61 Mg ha-1e0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
ZT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yields of 1.61 Mg ha-1 (2008) and 2.28 Mg ha-1 (2009) under MT were significantly higher than the yields from ZT and CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage maize grain yield was 2.28 Mg ha-1 in 2009 and exceeded zero and conventional tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.28 Mg ha-1e0
Qualifier
2009e0
Comparator
ZT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yields of 1.61 Mg ha-1 (2008) and 2.28 Mg ha-1 (2009) under MT were significantly higher than the yields from ZT and CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK and poultry manure increased grain yield 18-53% over separate application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NPK plus PMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
18-53%e0
Qualifier
under the three tillage systemse0
Comparator
their separate usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NPK plus PM resulted in 18-53% grain yield increments compared with their separate use under the three tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude joint organic and inorganic fertilizer use improves soil qualities and maize production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
improved soil chemical qualities and higher maize productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, improved soil chemical qualities and higher maize production can be achieved when organic and inorganic fertilizers are jointly applied than their separate use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1481 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.