Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Biometric Analyses of Yield, Oil and Protein Contents of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Different Environments

Ankica Kondić-Špika; Novica Mladenov; Nada Grahovac; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate: (1) the effects of genotype, environment, and their interactions on the oil content (OC), protein content (PC) and grain yield (GY) of 25 varieties of winter wheat, (2) the correlations among these traits in different environments, and (3) the effects of different climatic variables and their interactions with wheat genotypes for the examined traits. The field experiments were performed on three experimental sites in Serbia in 2009/10 and 2010/11. The most variable traits were GY and PC, while the variations of OC were lower. A significant positive correlation between wheat bran OC and GY was found in one, while highly significant negative correlations between PC and GY were found in three out of six environments. The partial least square regression (PLSR) triplots for protein content, oil content and grain yield enabled us to identify favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait and explained 31.9%, 32.6%, and 30.4% of the total variance, respectively. Cvs. Renesansa and Zvezdana were identified as genotypes with high average values for all traits, while cvs. Bankuty 1205 and Banatka were identified as potential sources of high protein content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content and grain yield were positively correlated in one environment.

Outcome
wheat bran OC and GYe1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
in onee1
Setting
Serbiae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant positive correlation between wheat bran OC and GY was found in one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–662 · show in text ↑
e2

“The field experiments were performed on three experimental sites in Serbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content and grain yield were highly significantly negatively correlated in three of six environments.

Outcome
PC and GYe2
Direction
negativee2
Qualifier
in three out of six environmentse2
Setting
Serbiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant negative correlations between PC and GY were found in three out of six environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–772 · show in text ↑
e3

“The field experiments were performed on three experimental sites in Serbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and protein content were the most variable traits, with oil content less variable.

Outcome
most variable traitse3
Qualifier
GY and PCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“The most variable traits were GY and PC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–541 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PLSR triplot for protein content explained 31.9% of the total variance.

Outcome
total variancee4
Value
31.9%e4
Qualifier
protein contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“explained 31.9%, 32.6%, and 30.4% of the total variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1015 · show in text ↑
e5

“The partial least square regression (PLSR) triplots for protein content, oil content and grain yield enabled us to identify favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–955 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PLSR triplot for oil content explained 32.6% of the total variance.

Outcome
total variancee4
Value
32.6%e4
Qualifier
oil contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“explained 31.9%, 32.6%, and 30.4% of the total variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1015 · show in text ↑
e5

“The partial least square regression (PLSR) triplots for protein content, oil content and grain yield enabled us to identify favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–955 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PLSR triplot for grain yield explained 30.4% of the total variance.

Outcome
total variancee4
Value
30.4%e4
Qualifier
grain yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“explained 31.9%, 32.6%, and 30.4% of the total variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1015 · show in text ↑
e5

“The partial least square regression (PLSR) triplots for protein content, oil content and grain yield enabled us to identify favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLSR triplots identified favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait of winter wheat.

Outcome
favorable and limiting climatic conditionse5
Qualifier
for each traite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“The partial least square regression (PLSR) triplots for protein content, oil content and grain yield enabled us to identify favorable and limiting climatic conditions for each trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars Renesansa and Zvezdana had high average values for all traits.

Material
Renesansa and Zvezdanae6
Outcome
high average values for all traitse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cvs. Renesansa and Zvezdana were identified as genotypes with high average values for all traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars Bankuty 1205 and Banatka are potential sources of high protein content.

Material
Bankuty 1205 and Banatkae7
Outcome
high protein contente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑
e7

“cvs. Bankuty 1205 and Banatka were identified as potential sources of high protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1225 · show in text ↑