Paper · 2019 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effect of rootstock and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield in watermelon

David H Suchoff; Jonathan R. Schultheis; Christopher C. Gunter; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Herbaceous grafting can be used to manage numerous soilborne pathogens in cucurbits. Rootstocks have been reported to increase the growth of the scion possibly due to more efficient use of nitrogen compared with non-grafted plants. The first objective of this study was to determine if the commercial rootstocks ‘Strongtosa’, ‘Carnivor’, or ‘Macis’ improve growth and production of the watermelon ‘Melody’ scion. The second objective was to determine whether these rootstocks have different nitrogen requirements in open-field production compared with non-grafted ‘Melody’. Field studies were conducted in 2013 and 2014 on the Sandhills Research Station in Jackson Springs, North Carolina. Nitrogen fertiliser was applied via drip irrigation at 0, 84, 126, 168, and 252 kg⋅ha−1. A linear relationship between nitrogen rate and rootstock cultivar existed; however, in all cases the non-grafted plants produced more than all grafted plants. Average fruit weight from the non-grafted plants was also higher than the grafted plants. Fruit from ‘Carnivor’- and ‘Strongtosa’-grafted plants had higher flesh firmness compared with non-grafted ‘Melody’. Our findings suggest that rootstocks do not increase yield or growth in the scion nor do they require different nitrogen application rates. However, some rootstocks do improve overall fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-grafted watermelon plants produced more yield than all grafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
non-grafted plantse1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree1
Comparator
all grafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“in all cases the non-grafted plants produced more than all grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–937 · show in text ↑
e2

“rootstocks do not increase yield or growth in the scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit weight was higher in non-grafted watermelon plants than in grafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
non-grafted plantse3
Outcome
Average fruit weighte3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
grafted plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“Average fruit weight from the non-grafted plants was also higher than the grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from ‘Carnivor’-grafted watermelon plants had higher flesh firmness than non-grafted ‘Melody’.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
‘Carnivor’e4
Outcome
flesh firmnesse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
non-grafted ‘Melody’e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit from ‘Carnivor’- and ‘Strongtosa’-grafted plants had higher flesh firmness compared with non-grafted ‘Melody’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1144 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from ‘Strongtosa’-grafted watermelon plants had higher flesh firmness than non-grafted ‘Melody’.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
‘Strongtosa’e4
Outcome
flesh firmnesse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
non-grafted ‘Melody’e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit from ‘Carnivor’- and ‘Strongtosa’-grafted plants had higher flesh firmness compared with non-grafted ‘Melody’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A linear relationship existed between nitrogen rate and rootstock cultivar in watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
linear relationship between nitrogen rate and rootstock cultivare5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“A linear relationship between nitrogen rate and rootstock cultivar existed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks did not increase yield or growth of the watermelon scion.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstockse2
Outcome
yield or growth in the scione2
Direction
do not increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“rootstocks do not increase yield or growth in the scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks did not require different nitrogen application rates in watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
nitrogen application ratese6
Qualifier
they require different nitrogen application ratese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“rootstocks do not increase yield or growth in the scion nor do they require different nitrogen application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1284 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.