Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Agronomic Evaluation of Performance of Sesame Varieties in Maize-based Intercropping System in the Southern Guinean Savanna of Nigeria

A. T. Ajibola; G. O. Kolawole

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: Field experiments were conducted to determine compatibility of sesame varieties for intercropping with maize. Study Design: The experiment was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Place and Duration of Study: Teaching and Research Farm, LAUTECH, Ogbomoso, southern guinea savanna area of Nigeria during the 2010 and 2011 cropping seasons. Methodology: The treatments included Sole maize (Oba Super 1 variety), five sole sesame varieties (E-8, O3l, O1m, O2 m, Exotic-Sudan) and their intercrops, making a total of eleven treatments. Sole maize was planted at a spacing of 75 cm x 25 cm. For intercrops, maize was planted at a spacing of 100 cm x 25 cm and sesame seeds were planted at a spacing of 100 cm x 10 cm such that sesame row alternated maize row. Maize was planted first and sesame was introduced two weeks after. Results: Intercropping maize with sesame varieties significantly (P = 0.05) reduced number of pods and grain yield of sesame varieties in both years. However, variety O2m produced grain yield in the intercrop similar to the mono crop. Generally, Intercropping sesame with maize significantly reduced the grain yield of maize by 36% compared to the sole crop. Exotic-Sudan varieties caused the highest percentage yield reduction (52%). Sesame varieties O2m and O3l were the only varieties whose yield advantage in intercropping with maize had land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.28 and 1.18 while other varieties had values less than 1 indicating yield advantage of O2m and O3l with maize. The relative crowding coefficient (K) value of maize (4.98) was higher than sesame (0.44) thus indicating its dominance in the mixture. Conclusion: It is concluded that the prospective sesame farmers could grow varieties O2m and O3l in place of the popular E-8 because intercropping with maize did not affect their performances in both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with maize reduced sesame pod number.

Treatment
Intercropping maize with sesame varietiese0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping maize with sesame varieties significantly (P = 0.05) reduced number of pods and grain yield of sesame varieties in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with maize reduced sesame grain yield.

Treatment
Intercropping maize with sesame varietiese0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
grain yield of sesame varietiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping maize with sesame varieties significantly (P = 0.05) reduced number of pods and grain yield of sesame varieties in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O2m intercrop yield was similar to monocrop yield.

Material
O2me0
Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
mono crope0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“variety O2m produced grain yield in the intercrop similar to the mono crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize grain yield by 36%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Intercropping sesame with maizee0
Interactor
sesameSesamum indicume0other
Outcome
grain yield of maizee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · InteractorFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping sesame with maize significantly reduced the grain yield of maize by 36% compared to the sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exotic-Sudan caused the highest maize yield reduction, 52%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Exotic-Sudane0
Outcome
percentage yield reductione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize-based Intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exotic-Sudan varieties caused the highest percentage yield reduction (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O2m had intercropping LER 1.28.

Material
O2me0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Value
1.28e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sesame varieties O2m and O3l were the only varieties whose yield advantage in intercropping with maize had land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.28 and 1.18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3l had intercropping LER 1.18.

Material
O3le0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Value
1.18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sesame varieties O2m and O3l were the only varieties whose yield advantage in intercropping with maize had land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.28 and 1.18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other sesame varieties had LER below 1.

Outcome
values less than 1e0
Direction
less thane0
Value
1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“other varieties had values less than 1 indicating yield advantage of O2m and O3l with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize crowding coefficient exceeded sesame, indicating dominance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
relative crowding coefficient (K) value of maizee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.98e0
Qualifier
0.44e0
Comparator
sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative crowding coefficient (K) value of maize (4.98) was higher than sesame (0.44) thus indicating its dominance in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1671 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers could grow O2m in place of E-8 for maize intercropping.

Material
O2me0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
could grow varieties O2m and O3l in place of the popular E-8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prospective sesame farmers could grow varieties O2m and O3l in place of the popular E-8 because intercropping with maize did not affect their performances in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1878 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers could grow O3l in place of E-8 for maize intercropping.

Material
O3le0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
could grow varieties O2m and O3l in place of the popular E-8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prospective sesame farmers could grow varieties O2m and O3l in place of the popular E-8 because intercropping with maize did not affect their performances in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1878 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sesamum indicum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.